Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Universal Health Care and Single Payer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:39 PM
Original message
Universal Health Care and Single Payer
Sounds great. Lets do it.

How do we pay for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. How are individuals and businesses paying for "insurance" now?
Seems those dollars could be redirected to ACTUALLY cover medical expenses rather than line the pockets of executives and pay for advertising and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's how it should be done.
Redirect the dollars going to private policies. And that redirection out of the insurance companies coffers is what upsets the insurance industry. Vast fortunes have been made with the system as it is now and any threat to that is going to face the resistance we see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:43 PM
Original message
Taxes. Unlikely anyone would pay nearly as much in taxes
as they do now for insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. +1 - That's the problem w/the current plans - $60k guys pay the same as $500k guys...
Assuming that your life is your most precious thing, the idea that a person's healthcare should be at a flat price rather than a flat rate makes no sense.

I would propose a flat percentage with no ceiling on all income (not just wages).

The poor would get heath care.

The middle class would pay less.

Those making over $500,000 would pay the same flat rate as the middle class, so it's fair, because they're the first ones to tell you that flat taxes are fair.

Add up the numbers, calculate the costs, and divide it up by income and you have your rate.

Why do I have to solve every problem?

:-)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Your solution works for me. Sadly, there's way too much common sense applied.
Elected Democrats would never buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. The current rates are based on how much the companies think it will cost them
to provide you health care (plus their profit). If two health individuals in their 30's both have one doctors visit a year and no other health related issues (or potential risk factors) should one person pay 10x for this service simply because he makes 10 times a much money? If private companies were to start charging people based on their income, people would be pissed (and rightly so). If you want to charge people based on how much they make, this HAS to be done via the government. No one would tolerate a private company implementing such a policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. BINGO. Single, self-employed would not have to pay more for insurance than rent.
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 12:57 PM by Captain Hilts
And EVERYBODY pays in. No free riders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. think of the billions wasted on advertising - wouldn't be necessary anymore nt
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 12:43 PM by msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cut out the non-medical middlemen who have no interest in actual
health 'care' but rely on profits from people being sick. I know, impossible, their claws are in too deep, but really ...... it's the only way I can think of to get 300+ million into a single pool that would enable quality, available health-care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedRocco Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nationalize the insurance companies and hospitals
and seize their assets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. But first, mandate insurance for everyone...
make those companies go through all the trouble of getting everyone signed up before you take over their business.

Maybe we're on that road already. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Single Payer doesn't cost, it pays.
The insurance companies would be the ones "paying" for it. Everyone else would benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. We already far more than needed.
We pay enough for every person in the country, and all of our visitors, to have the mythical 'Cadillac' health plan.

There is only one cause for this health care crisis and it is the very scum we are going to have enshrined as the quasi-governmental 'deciders' of our fates for the rest of our lives. Oh, and we get to guarantee their obscene profits, at our further expense and the slow death of SS & Medicare.
:grr:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Single Payer--each person is taxed accoring to his/her annual income
A person who earns 20K will pay less than someone who
earns 50 K. Graduated like Income Tax.

There is no such thing as Free Health Care. Some people
may have misconstrued this because you just go to Doctor
or Hospital and there is no bill. or payment you make
at the time of visit. However you taxes are paying for
it. It is like Insurance but all cost of running
a company are gone. The Government collects the money
'and pays the bill. This is why some people think it
is free. They never see or pay any bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Way2go Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Federal sales tax?

No? How does the gov. pay for anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. We already pay for it. Just cut out the middle-man and we're all set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. We?
I have never paid a dime to health insurance. Except thru car insurance.??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Your car insurance would much less, without injury insurance.
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 03:12 PM by jtrockville
If we had universal single payer, you (and everyone else) would pay far less for your car insurance.

Add that to what those who are paying for the RACKET we call health insurance, and we don't need to add anything more to provide universal single-payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Expanded Medicare for all...
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 01:13 PM by maryf
with a medicare tax expansion, progressive for the wealthier; plus with a tax on stock transactions...Tax the rich...HR676 pretty much has written it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. $57,000 per minute on Afghanistan War ---Mother Jones n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. Cut the military budget.
We're already paying enough in taxes as is.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. Expand the existing Medicare tax (part of FICA).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't know
How do we pay for endless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
How do we pay for bailouts for the greedy bankers and wallstreeters?
How do we pay for the mercenaries that are in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Short Answer?
We borrow that money.

What sucks is that most people don't mind borrowing to bomb, but don't want to borrow to have health care for all.

It is a matter of priorities, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Only way is to tax it to the max
If it is to work, it will need to be taxed at least ten times the rate as Medicare is now or it too will go broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. maybe
What do you think about a war tax?

A health care tax is one way to pay the bills, agreed.
How about a war tax, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I think it is a good idea
and that it should be implemented the first day of hostilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. So
How much of a tax should we be paying for Afghanistan, today? Retroactive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Its probably too late for Afghanistan
and I have no idea how the numbers work out. Waging war on credit is a terrible idea and we are going to be paying for it for a real long time, but raising taxes during this downturn would be just as bad. To be honest, I have no idea what would be best for us at this time. President Obama was left a huge mess he is going to be damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. So
Are you in favor of the actions in Afghanistan?

If you are, then why not be for a tax to pay for it? Waging war on credit is a terrible idea. But we are doing it on credit. So being that it is true that we are to be paying for it a long time, why not raise a tax for it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I would prefer that we begin a phased withdrawal
and exit Afghanistan.

I did not say I was against a tax to pay for it. What I said was that it has gone for so long without us paying for it and when you combine that with the sorry state our economy is in, raising taxes right now to pay for it may hurt millions of Americans. Maybe a small tax to begin paying on it for now and then raise it as our economic conditions improve? As I said, I do not know what the answer is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. Increase payroll deductions a tad. Luxury Item tax. Tax the bejesus outta the rich.
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 03:15 PM by Edweird
Cake.
The Canadians have a good thing going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. Just to get a good jump on it
let's get the hell out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan...and Yemen. Let's quit bailing out "too-big-to-fail" corporate nabobs.

Hmm. That oughta get us started in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fading Captain Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. Tax everyone more -- Anyone who claims to be for it, must acknowledge this
I am for it. I am willing to pay higher taxes.
Businesses must pay higher taxes.
We all must pay higher taxes.

It's that simple.
We lost the Democratic Party the day Dems became ashamed to be called "tax and spend."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefthandedlefty Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. Cut whatever it costs from the military
Cut them back to pre 1981 levels that should be plenty to pay for healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. Taxes, of course. Which is why it's so unpopular.
As soon as most Americans hear "increased taxes" they vote "no". Never mind they would actually save money since Medicare has a 95% MLR whereas most private companies have a 70% MLR because they have to make a Profit. Their eyes just glaze over when you try to explain it. Plus, many of them are convinced that the government just can't function as well as a private company. I had that conversation with a co-worker, recently. I pointed out fucked-up our own company was with it's own bureaucracy, but he insisted the government would be worse.

*sigh* Hence, we have to get what we can when we can. It's not Obama's fault, it's not Rahm's fault, it's not any Dem's fault. It's the fault of idiots like my co-worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
36. Taxes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC