Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone just see that CNN presentation of the "wingnuts" of the year?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 06:49 AM
Original message
Anyone just see that CNN presentation of the "wingnuts" of the year?
I think they just sprained a muscle in order to defend their de-facto motto of "fair and balanced."

That was just crazy. To their credit, they named Michelle Bachmann the "wingnut of the year." But do they even know what a "wingnut" is? Ed Schultz was the runner-up.

You would think an outfit that proclaims itself the world's authority on news would know what a "wingnut" is.

They equated Ed Schultz telling the truth about the Republican doctrine of let people die, with the Palin/Bachmann lies of "death panels."

It seems to me that they are getting a little too "fair and balanced." Have I said this before? Lies aren't deserving of "balance."

Lies are lies. And they have flooded CNN since Ted Turner ceded control of that network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ed Schultz?
CNN has become unwatchable for me. No wonder they're losing viewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was ready to puke
I detest CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. An attempt to be "fair and balanced" I suppose.
Edited on Fri Jan-01-10 07:37 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
I don't get to watch Ed because he doesn't podcast. But from what I've seen he's nothing like Bachmann (who is a freaking representative!)

Whatever.

If you ask what 2+2 is, and get back "4" and "22" for answers, the correct answer is "4", not 13.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow. That's a stretch. CNN is the unwatchable. The AM crew sits at
a desk that comes to the anchors knees.. only so the viewer can see leg from the woman.. anyone notice that. Blitzer asks questions and spins questions... My 5yr old could do a better interview than he could. That's one channel I would choose not to pay for if I could pick a la carte for cable channels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Women on morning television are subjected to a lot of crotch-level camera angles. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Just The Subject...Shows Where Our "Journalism" Is Gone...
And who decided this list and how? I've got no problems naming Bachmann the winner...even though I can think of 10 without breaking a sweat.

Point is this isn't news...it's gossip. It's what makes this network unwatchable...especially when it's delivered by a bunch of bobbleheads who look like they should be working at the local hardware store.

The less cable "news" I watch these days, the better my life is. NatGeo gets a lot of my viewing time these days...

Happy New Years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. I have pretty much given up on all TV news
catch the Weather Channel sometimes, but I am getting pretty much everything from the net now. TV is just a waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. They are way more fair and balanced than Fox n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think Ed Schultz was #5 on the list, and #2 was Alan Grayson.
Also on the list was Sarah Palin -- at #3, if I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC