Heads-up: Charter school pushers targeting Seattle

[Hannah Bell]

Charters are currently illegal in Seattle (if I understand correctly) but the district is being targeted for busting by the usual foundation capitalists.

The Superintendent of Schools is a Broad Foundation-trained plant & is bringing in other Broad Foundation people (the Broad Foundation being one of the biggest charter school funders & pushers in the country):

****

Thursday, August 27, 2009
Put Them on Notice

There's been a lot of wondering outloud here; what can we do about the influence of foundations, in particular the Broad Foundation, in our district? We read about the disaster that was Broad's influence in Oakland and we know the deafening silence from the Superintendent about what her relationship is with the Foundation. She has expanded her relationship with Broad and now serves as a member of an Advisory Board. We have two current Broad residents (whom the Foundation expects the district to hire at the end of the year). We already have one former Broad resident who works for the district. The district is also paying the full salary for one SPS employee who has no ties to Broad (at least that I know of), apparently out of the goodness of their heart. Not.

So I have told the Board that we need more transparency. I will e-mail all of them soon and see what replies I get. Additionally, I sent an e-mail to David Esselman who is an associate director at Broad's education arm who oversees Broad Academy superintendents (Dr. Goodloe-Johnson being one of them).

So, what the point? The point is PUT THEM ON NOTICE. "Hello there, I'm parent X in SPS and I know of your relationship with our district. I am watching and I have let my district's leadership know I am watching. I am letting reporters in our area know about this relationship so they know about your actions every step of the way. I am still waiting to get an explanation of what the relationship is and what the expectations are on both ends. In short, we will not be rolled. You will get pushback and a fight if you think you can come into our district and make your agenda our agenda. If you think we won't find out...we will. It may take awhile but you are on our radar. "

Are they going to worry about me? Of course not because who the hell am I to them. The point, however, is there is a blog and we exist as thinking parents and as people who will speak up (to our Mayor, to our legislators, etc.). I am a firm believer in letting people know that good people of faith will not just stand by.

http://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/search/label/Broad%20Foundation

*****

"This year's budget references (twice) that the Superintendent's office is getting $127,000 for some workers (I phrase it this way for a reason to become evident). Here are the references:


Additions to administrative and support staff of 9.0 FTE include: a 1.0 Broad
Resident, a Senior Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent’s Office,

Addition to the Superintendent’s office of Broad Resident, and a Senior
Administrative staff position. Cost increase of $127 thousand.


I wrote and asked for clarification on these positions. So I did finally receive the job descriptions and explanations none of which really answer the question - are there new hires and where is the $127,000 going?

So I wrote to the legal staff again and said, "So again I will ask you (and will hold you and the district to your reply); are there any new hires in the Superintendent's office?"

I was told that both positions already exist but (1) Carol Treat who is the Executive Director of Strategic Planning and Alliances and was getting paid via the Alliance is now going to be paid, entirely, by the Broad Foundation. Why would they do that? Is she a Broad resident? Don't think so because they would only be funding half her salary as a Resident... Her salary? Carol Treat earns $144,994.01 annually; with benefits the total is $169,034. And, according to the job description, that's for 260 days of work.

The other position is Venetia Harmon, Sr. Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent. Venetia Harmon makes $54,910.94 annually; with benefits the total is $64,015.17.

Both allegedly report directly to the Superintendent even though Ms. Harmon's position has two other supervisors (neither the Superintendent) listed.

So again:

where is the $127,000 being used for? It can't be just Ms. Harmon's salary so what is it being used for?

why is the Broad Foundation paying for Ms. Treat's salary?
who is the Broad Resident referenced in both places in the budget?

And lastly, why the hell won't the district give a straight answer to a direct question?

***

"The state of Washington has not once, not twice but three times turned back charters. Clearly, we see something that other states (and apparently the Broad Foundation) don't. Additionally, in Seattle, as Dr. Goodloe-Johnson could tell you, we have many "alternative" schools. These are schools started by parents with a great idea and focus. Most are very popular and have waitlists. They are fully-funded by Seattle Public Schools. For Seattle, we don't need charters. So I am wary of the relationship between the Broad Foundation and SPS because of the charter issue...

So I would like to ask you, frankly, what are Broad's intentions in SPS? Why would the Broad Foundation pay the entire salary (about $145,000) for one SPS employee who isn't even associated with the Foundation? I was not happy to hear about the two Broad residents hired last year. We have closed schools over the last 4 years (including this year) and RIFed many teachers this year. Our State Auditor in an audit of SPS said we have too many staff for headquarters. It seems almost disrespectful then to bring on more adminstrators at a time when the district cries poor to teachers, parents and students..."

*****


"Do you hear that train coming? It's building up steam as we speak. And so, when I see the list of alternative schools listed, both on the most recent SPS home calendar AND the SPS website, grow smaller, I have to wonder what is coming. Yes, we still have our alternatives but they seem to be somewhat swept under the carpet otherwise, why are they not noted on the calendar and the website as alternatives? I think alternative school parents have very, very good reasons to worry. But don't worry; at this rate, you can always reopen as a charter later on.

*****


If you support public education, heads up. If you're a teacher, heads up too. They're gunning for you.

[Dinger]

1. Kickin' And 4th Rec For Truth (nt)

[Dinger]

2. "Charter School Pushers" . . .

Why is this reminiscent of drug pushers to me?

[Hannah Bell]

4. yep.

[gateley]

3. K&R

[johnaries]

5. I disagree with you on a lot of things, HB, but education

is the most important long-term issue we will face.

We have several short-term issues that you and I will fight tooth-nail about. But for the future we need a better system for teaching our children. The old system isn't working. The recent system isn't working.

Both are "fiscal-based". Perhaps we should try for something different?

I am reminded of the "Suzuki" method of music training:

Typically, we teach a child the "rules" of music. We place a piece of paper in front of them and say "this is music - play it according to the notes on the paper" and then, once they learn the "rules" then they are encouraged to "break them". It takes years of "unlearning what you have learned" to create an imaginary genius.

In the "Suzuki" method, children are taught to play the instruments by ear. They are taught music first, and notation later. They realize that the "notes" on the page are just "notes". The music is what comes from within you. The "notes" are just to help you join with everyone else around you to create something Greater than the Whole.

I never had the benefit of the Suzuki method. I had a much longer journey.

But I have had the experience of being on stage, playing my trumpet, and being part of something that was greater than myself - greater than all of the people in our orchestra - greater than all of the above blended with with audience!

I will never experience that again. But I can die happy because of that experience.

Most of you will have no clue what I'm talking about. Well, that's ok. You can't

[Hannah Bell]

6. no, i have no clue what you're talking about except you've gone out of your way to attack

me personally in your last four posts, without provocation.

it's not about me, or you. or your experiences on stage.

[Nikki Stone1]

7. This needs to be more widely known

..