|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
placton
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:01 PM Original message |
Why the Blackwater Case Stinks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Didn't we find out about a week ago that Eric Prince is CIA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. He tried to get in the CIA but couldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Politico and RawStory cite a Vanity Fair article that says he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yes he was an asset because he couldn't get in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Oh, gotcha. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
placton
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. oh yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
placton
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. had these defendants been black or hispanic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. I suppose the insurgents know how to find Blackwater's U.S. headquarters on a map. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLDCVADem
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. seems to me the court did enforce the rights of citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Could you explain the deal made and reneged on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLDCVADem
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. When the killings were first being investigated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. and poof! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-01-10 10:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_b
![]() |
Sat Jan-02-10 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
14. The Ted Stevens treatment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC