Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Privatizing the commons: Cali law gave for-profit charters building titles, public construction $$$

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:53 AM
Original message
Privatizing the commons: Cali law gave for-profit charters building titles, public construction $$$
The good news for... the new charter retail chains that are bubbling up like Pay Day Loans in the face of the destruction of public education through over thirty years of economic and social neglect, has just recently been signed into law under the nose of the corporate sock puppet press...

It’s really pretty simple: the plan calls for a transfer of the public title of public schools from the public sector to the private or non-profit sector. The entity who pays or paid for the public school title is of course the public, and through our taxes all this can be transferred now to the burgeoning retail charter chains like Green Dot and others — retail educational chains promoted and backed by philanthro-capitalists like Bill Gates, the Walton ‘family’, and Eli Broad: outfits like Alliance Public Schools that is seeking approval for eight new charters in Los Angeles as we speak.

Furthermore, there is nothing in the bill that states the charter chains must be non-profit or publicly run; on the contrary, they can trade on the New York Stock Exchange and still participate in the land grab. That’s good news for shareholders and CEO’s of these schools; a direct investment of public funds in their profiting schemes...

The passage into law of this bill gives them access over $900 million in voter-approved California Propositions 44, 55 and 1D funds for construction projects and simplifies the funding formula for charter schools so they can get their cash right way. The role of government under neo-liberalism is to transfer not just control to the new entrepreneurs, but the tax funding and public title to ‘for-profit’ or ‘non-profit’ charter school chains...

Here was the problem for the charter chains and why the bill was introduced and signed into law. Under current (old) California law...the taxpayer funds (couldn't) be released for the private charter school construction projects unless a school district (held) the property’s title...

Now the charters can hold the title which puts them on the road to public and private pillage. Charter schools lobbied for the new law, SB 92; they complained that the process to get their hands on taxpayer funds was excessive, resulting in delays in initiating projects or acquiring land...Their hands (were) tied, they claimed; they (couldn't) get to your wallet quickly or expeditously enough – too many regulations...

...All for the kids, of course, or at least that is what Arnold Schwarzenegger said when he signed the bill into law on October 12, 2009:

"I am committed to ensuring California’s kids have the opportunity for a quality education and charter schools are proving that their innovative approaches can provide it,” said Schwarzenegger. That is why I am signing these bills to cut red tape and simplify funding formulas to allow charter schools the chance to thrive here in our state...."

http://dailycensored.com/2009/11/17/good-news-for-charter-school-chains-in-california-asset-stripping-gives-them-titles-to-public-schools/









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. a for profit charter school
seriously messed up my daughter's education. She's going to a private school now, doing quite well, and we're suing the school district to have them pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If it's a for-profit charter, why not sue the charter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. we are
we're suing the district and the charter. They're both horribly culpable in all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wounded Bear Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Some things just don't fit the profit model....
Some things must be not for profit. Ceding these over to "non-profit" private entities is only the first step in transferring them to the corporate model, and destroying the last vestiges of education in our country. This is a leap out onto a very slippery slope. Wasn't one of the first things they did after Katrina was start up multiple charter schools in New Orleans to replace the public schools that were destroyed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. yes. disaster capitalism at its finest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. EXACTLY. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Far too important to sink: This needs some recs
and now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Cronie Capitalism...
...isn't just for warmongers anymore.

Now the enemies of public education can get a big piece of the action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's why Arnie was installed......
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Exactly why. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. And may I remind everyone that California
has a DEMOCRATIC legislature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC