Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bush-Cheney Economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 05:30 PM
Original message
The Bush-Cheney Economy
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/01/the-bushcheney-economy.html

The Bush-Cheney Economy

Or why conservatism needs to rethink its economic policies:

The lost decade for the economy
The U.S. economy has expanded at a healthy clip for most of the last 70 years, but by a wide range of measures, it stagnated in the first decade of the new millennium. Job growth was essentially zero, as modest job creation from 2003 to 2007 wasn't enough to make up for two recessions in the decade. Rises in the nation's economic output, as measured by gross domestic product, was weak. And household net worth, when adjusted for inflation, fell as stock prices stagnated, home prices declined in the second half of the decade and consumer debt skyrocketed.







http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2010/01/01/GR2010010101478.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. ever since georgee,
the economy has been off, no matter how the expert and talking heads said. i NEVER had to work so hard at art shows as i did the past 8 years. clinton? easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. President Obama would probably advise us to drop the blame game and concentrate on creating jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_J Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is interesting data -

- and everyone should understand the repercussions of fighting two insurgent wars.

I didn't feel this was just playing a blame game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Actually, you are wrong.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=433&topic_id=104372

snip//

Pfeiffer offered a "substantive context" for those who seem desperate to assign blame for a failed terrorist attack.

{F}or seven years after 9/11, while our national security was overwhelmingly focused on Iraq -- a country that had no al Qaeda presence before our invasion -- Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda's leadership was able to set up camp in the border region of Pakistan and Afghanistan, where they continued to plot attacks against the United States. Meanwhile, al Qaeda also regenerated in places like Yemen and Somalia, establishing new safe-havens that have grown over a period of years. It was President Obama who finally implemented a strategy of winding down the war in Iraq, and actually focusing our resources on the war against al Qaeda -- more than doubling our troops in Afghanistan, and building partnerships to target al Qaeda's safe-havens in Yemen and Somalia. And in less than one year, we have already seen many al Qaeda leaders taken out, our alliances strengthened, and the pressure on al Qaeda increased worldwide.

To put it simply: this President is not interested in bellicose rhetoric, he is focused on action. Seven years of bellicose rhetoric failed to reduce the threat from al Qaeda and succeeded in dividing this country. And it seems strangely off-key now, at a time when our country is under attack, for the architect of those policies to be attacking the President.


That's a rather diplomatic way of saying, "Dick, you had your shot and you failed. Now shut up while we clean up your mess. You can thank us later."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thank you!
Dick is still trying to stay relevant....but as time passes and the U.S. is steered in the correct direction...he will be historically remembered as a draft dodging failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_J Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I'm wrong because this is not interesting data?

Sorry Sister I don't get your point. Or perhaps you didn't get mine.

Flat job growth over a decade is astounding. I think we can agree on that without it being part of a blame game :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Get thee to the Greatest Page!

Hiya Sis, and thank you. :hug: :*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hi, friend!
I loved that :loveya: thread for you; you deserve it! :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm so grateful, and so blessed.
And in need of a handkercheif.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC