by teacherken
Those words were spoken by a white cop to black woman in Florida. The year was 1970. The Levi family's Lincoln Continental was pulled over by the cop late at night and Walter, the husband, was made to get out. Eileen, who died this past year, got out with her three boys to try to protect her husband when they heard the words in the title of this diary.
If you want, you can read about the life of Eileen Levi here in the Washington Post, as one of Nine Stories (you can access them all by clicking on the pictures across the top.
======================================================================================================
This diary is not about Eileen Levi, even though I admire her as a teacher. It is about those who have power and can abuse it, and why we must always have oversight. It was reading the words with which I titled this that convinced me I had to write this diary.
======================================================================================================
Yesterday I posted several comments in open threads about post from Andrew Sullivan at his blog at The Atlantic, The Daily Dish. He was looking back at several posts in October, one of which was an email from a reader in response to what he posted, and finally an email from a reader in response to his reposting of those two October pieces. In order, they are
1. Posts Of The Year: They Tortured A Man They Knew To Be Innocent, October 1, 2009:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/01/posts-of-the-year-they-tortured-a-man-they-knew-to-be-innocent-october-1-2009.html2. Email Of The Year: October 2, 2009:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/01/email-of-the-year-october-2-2009.html3. Torture Will Stay With Us:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/01/torture-will-stay-with-us.htmlI strongly urge reading all three, in order. In the first, Sullivan provides links to a Huffington Post piece by Andy Worthington and to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U. S. District Court in DC, who also served 9 years as chief judge of the FISA Court, appointed by CJ Rehnquist to that position, and to the Federal Bench by Bill Clinton. The case in question involved a Kuwaiti man named Fouad al-Rabiah, taken into custody in Afghanistan, transported to Guantanamo, where he was tortured (using "enhanced interrogation methods"). Those holding him eventually determined he was innocent. And then? Read the following from p. 41 of the Judge's opinion, something quoted in the 2nd post by a Justice Department trial lawyer: al-Rabiah was told by his principal interrogator
===================================================================================================
"There is nothing against you. But there is no innocent person here. So, you should confess to something so you can be charged and sentenced and serve your sentence and then go back to your family and country, because 'you will not leave this place innocent'."
====================================================================================================
(the italics were added by the Justice Department lawyer)
There is more to consider. The third post was from someone who reminded Sullivan of the Chicago police commander who had tortured people in interrogations to get false confessions, which also meant the real perpetrators were still walking free, and how those in the State Legislature of Illinois, including a young State Senator named Barack Obama, had moved to require all interrogations be videotaped to prevent such abuses in the future.
<snip>
Perhaps it is our human weakness. We are tempted to wield power, to intimidate, because we can, because it seems more efficient.
I am then reminded of an ancient Latin phrase, from the poet Juvenal, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? I have reflected on this phrase before, in this diary from February 22, 2009. I will not repeat here what I wrote then.
The phrase is important. Who watches those who watch us? We give people authority to keep us safe, orderly secure, to be certain. But we are supposed to be a government of laws, not of men. That is in part because we are not angels.
<snip>
But we do need more. No one should ever have power that is unchecked. That includes presidents, be they named Truman (steel seizure case), Nixon (Watergate), Bush (take your pick), or Obama (whose administration continued to prosecute the al-Rabiah case until the judge granted the defendants habeas request).
And that sure as hell should include cops who say things like If you don't put those children back in the car, I'll shoot your husband.
Whatever we do in our politics, we should never lose sight of the idea that in our system of government, we acknowledge that men are not angels, that there must be restraints on their actions, that there must be oversight, and accountability for abuses of power.
That should apply to nations as well, but unfortunately we still have such an excess of military and economic power that the abuses by various administrations in the application of that power are not subject to oversight and accountability from other nations. That makes it even more incumbent upon "We the People of the United States" who are the ultimate sovereign to insist upon it ourselves.
We must be faithful in this in little things as well as big things. If we ignore the little things, we will embolden ever more people to abuse what powers they have.
If we don't, then it will not just be a black family on a rural road in Florida that hears such horrifying words as these:
If you don't put those children back in the car, I'll shoot your husband
Peace
Eileen Levi's story in the WaPo:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/artsandliving/magazine/2009-lives-to-remember/levi.htmlhttp://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/1/3/821486/-If-you-dont-put-those-children-back-in-the-car,-Ill-shoot-your-husbandI read that story and put my head on my desk for a long time. I don't think anybody is watching the watchers. At least, nobody in a position of power to make a difference. They are entrenched, and even more so because of Cheney.
If you read 'Angler', you will see he had his paws in every department of government on every level. He also knew what positions really wielded power or at least could gum up the works. Cheney knew where to place people in lower levels to really keep an eye on things.