|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:11 AM Original message |
One determined passenger with no weapons is a threat to an airliner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. good luck to that passenger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:31 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. lots of things are 'possible' in a person's imagination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Would you have thought 4 planes could have been used as missiles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. yes. I certainly did think such a thing is possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. yes- and so did architects. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Deleted sub-thread |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
66. If YOU stay on the ground, it reduces the likelihood of a "whacked out passenger" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
3. The old "safety in numbers" adage comes into play... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. You aren't taking into consideration the size restraints of a airplane's compartment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
84. Using techniques similar to cell extractions in a prison/jail - one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
103. Actually, I'd argue the opposite... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
4. not in this day and age. other passengers will not be passive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
87. for all the chest beating going on, it was ironic that it was a dutch national that took on the terp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
6. Remember that last attempted underwear bomber? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. And you would probably have been suffocated by the other fifteen guys trying to get at him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. Those aisles can only accommodate one passenger at a time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
64. Between the passengers sitting next to him, behind him, and in front of him, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. What if it was a plane full of octogenarians? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. oh goody...another "what if"!!! sooooo fun! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. Passengers rising up and becoming vigilantes is a "what if". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
8. explosive decompression would not happen with the loss of one window |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Sure would make it hard to fly an airplane, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:48 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. no...knocking a window out of a plane would NOT make it hard to fly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
13. Deleted sub-thread |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
14. I always imagine TSA agents taking Bruce Lee's nail clippers away from him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
16. One determined nut with no weapons is mostly a threat to himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. That is not an appropriate analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
49. Maybe not but it was kind of a funny mind picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
19. They are called drunks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
20. Recall the Aloha Airlines plane that lost a big chunk of the cabin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Yeah, man, that's the flight I want to be on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:04 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. a lone terrorist (hell 10) without an expolosive COULD NOT DO THIS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. So, you are saying that an airplane's passenger compartment while in flight is inescapable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. nope...not even close...try reading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. and there a quite a few DUers around here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Who the fuck are you again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. i am me...who the fuck are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. another poster who absolutely must have the last word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. and it makes me so happy to be able to continue this little exchange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. You are the one who started with the personal attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. exactly where did i attack YOU and not your stupid OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:41 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. upthread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. well, he's right. your scenario is laughable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:50 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Seriously? You are 100% certain that scenario is not possible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. i'd wager the odds are incredibly small |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:53 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. none of that is what you originally posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. Do you know the definition of "hypothetical situation"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. i also know the difference between one and pure bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. yes...you're post is not hypothetical in the sense that it might actually happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Wow, so how do you obtain this knowledge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. basic understanding of aircraft construction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Are you an aircraft engineer or physicist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. you don't need to be an aircraft engineer or a physicist to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:17 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Still waiting for you to back up your assertion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. you are the one asserting that a broken window will crash a plane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Yeah, I was the one speculating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. i am certain YOUR OP is complete bullshit...yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. Haven't we gone over this long enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:47 PM Response to Reply #81 |
97. Would you two please get a fucking room and free up some bandwidth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. but it has been soooo much fun... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. So it WAS good for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. flat out hot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. In that case, by all means carry on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #63 |
90. I think it's only fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. no, that is not an attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Okay how about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. nope...again...responding to a post of yours but you can keep claiming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Still trying to get that last word, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. watching you try is actually pretty fun... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:03 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. yeah, that was the point of my post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. you post was that someone could disable or cause a plane to crash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. So you are saying that scenario is absolutely 100% impossible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. no...but I am certain enough to say it is bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. nope...not even close...try reading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Man, talk about blowing things out of proportion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. about as likely as your 'hypothetical' happening...do you have a point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Yeah, my point is that a person with no weapons could probably bring down an aircraft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. you're speculation was dead wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Actually, come to think of it, I was just on a Continental Beechcraft 1900 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. once again...NOTHING to do with your OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. see ya later. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. The point being that knocking out a window is an extremely unlikely way to bring down a plane.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 04:39 PM Response to Reply #31 |
102. just knocking out the window in the first place is extremely unlikely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. That was just an experimental convertible 737. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #48 |
70. Dumbass pilot should have known better than to try and put the top down while moving.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
21. If I obsessed about stuff like that, I'd never fly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
47. That's Not the Point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:13 PM Response to Reply #47 |
92. To be honest, I worry more about the police than I do about regular folks with mental problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
37. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
45. "What if" can be strung out forever. "What if" a frog's ass wasn't so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
83. Do you fly at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. Yeah, just got back from the Bahamas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 08:52 PM Response to Reply #88 |
105. It's all 'Security Theater'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
89. Epic thread is epic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #89 |
93. taking a quick meeting break |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
91. Maybe he will use his kung fu skills to chop the plane in half? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oldtimeralso (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
94. I can tell you with almost an absolute degree of certainty.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Nice try, pal. I bet you never did any of that WHILE YOU WERE HIGH ON PCP!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. unless you can be 100% certain... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
104. Surely someone will slap a carotid choke on him and then restrain him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC