Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Only 25% of Americans Can Correctly Answer That Around 900 Troops Have Been Killed in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:40 PM
Original message
Only 25% of Americans Can Correctly Answer That Around 900 Troops Have Been Killed in Afghanistan
Source: Pew Research Center

Most Americans cannot correctly estimate the number of U.S. military personnel that have been killed in the war in Afghanistan. Only a quarter of the public is able to correctly answer that around 900 troops have been killed in that war. Most Americans overestimate the number of troop causalities in Afghanistan. Another 25% estimate the fatality count to be around 1,500, while 27% say it is around 2,500. By contrast, 42% of Americans are able to correctly estimate the number of troop deaths in the Iraq war at around 4,300. As in Afghanistan, the public is more likely to overestimate (30%) than underestimate (22%) the number of troop fatalities in Iraq. Notably, those who report they are following either war very closely in the news are no more likely than the public at large to correctly estimate the number of troop fatalities of each respective war.

http://pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=890

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. A strong indictment of the pro-war, for profit M$M n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Ermm.... Most people OVER estimate.
Wouldn't that be contrary to what a pro-war MSM would want and seek to drive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. No, not at all
Anesthetizing citizens to the significance of war deaths - to the point they simply pull what 'feels' to them a reasonable figure out of the air - would be the goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Not really.
According to my idiot freeper family members, the war in Iraq was absolutely justified because they defended themselves.
Yes, they think that because they shot back we were justified in invading in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder what the magic no. is to end the killing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was disheartened to see that so many think it is higher,
yet support for it continues. It suggests we have many more deaths to go through before the American public has had enough.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Honestly, I'm surprised the number is that high.
We're not exactly know for facts 'n' accuracy 'n' stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. do they care? no.
heads in the sand. its not 'their kids'.
and how many civilians?
MSM is no better then it was with Bush 's atrocities.
now they wont show Obama's atrocities.
knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. k because this is more important than michelle obama cooking food
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't remember Brian Williams mentioning it.
Nor have many of the rest of the, uh, news community brought it up.

Gosh. Has it been 10 years, already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC