Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 Sci-Fi Weapons That Actually Exist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:51 PM
Original message
10 Sci-Fi Weapons That Actually Exist
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/01/sci-fi-weapons/



After learning about an experimental weapon that can make people feel seasick, Limor Fried and Phil Torrone decided to build their own. They did it for less than $250, and wrote step-by-step instructions so that anyone can make one at home.

It can create a nauseating lightshow with 36 pulsating LEDs.

Their design has a bonus feature. You can set it to disco mode. Instead of making you sick, the weapon will add life to your next party.

http://www.ladyada.net/make/bedazzler/index.html




The XM-25 grenade launcher is equipped with a laser rangefinder and on-board computer. It packs a magazine of four 25mm projectiles, and programs them to detonate as they pass by their targets. That feature will allow soldiers to strike enemies who are taking cover. By 2012, the Army hopes to arm every infantry squad and Special Forces unit with at least one of the big guns.

In August, a lucky soldier got to pull the trigger, and fire off a HEAB, or High Explosive Air Burst, round at the Aberdeen Testing Ground in Maryland. Those projectiles pack quite a punch. They are purportedly 300 percent more effective than normal ammo, and will be able to strike targets as far as 700 meters (2,300 feet) away.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/01/sci-fi-weapons/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick because I want to read this one later
Thanks for posting it The Straight Story.

And Happy New Year.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. What no Gauss made the list?
We science fiction writers have had a hard time over the last few years.

Other things that already exists.

That bug on the wall, might not really be biological.

We've been playing wiht Gauss and lasers have been mounted on aircraft for a while. Just not pretty colors, ok.

Oh and SWORDS did turn on it's handlers in '04. Was it bad code or ... something else? Problem is as a plot that is old hat by now.

And of course drones have taken not just to the air...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Psychopath" Is the Word That Comes to Mind, to Describe Their Inventors
And their collaborators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Another is "Defense Contractors".
Your tax dollars at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. 6 of 1, a half dozen of the other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Not necessarily
I've had experience with the sound device which was combined with a light device while on anti-piracy ops. The pirates refused to stop despite numerous warning shots in front of their boat. One shot with the device and they immediately stopped their motors and agreed to be boarded. It is a device that, had we not had it, might have required lethal force to be used instead. To me, it is a much more humane method of control in zones where full fledged combat isn't taking place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. So you think the guy who made the non-lethal sea sick weapon is a psycho?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yeah
It's a neat trick, the way a tyrannical operation works in ways to insure opponents have no means to defend themselves or otherwise get a shot in.

Really there's not much difference between someone using an object like that to defeat an opponent and a dentist who molests his clients while they're high on gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I guess you'd rather them use CS gas, batons and rubber bullets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for the find
kicking now so I can find later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. They've been working on the XM-25 since 2005
As part of the XM-29 OICW since the 1990s. Then by itself since '05. Not that I don't think it would a be a vast improvement over the other grenade launchers out there, but I'll believe it when I see it fielded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. It may be a setback compared to the others
This is a 25mm grenade launcher; the M203 and Mk.19 are 40mm weapons. A 40mm projectile is larger than a 25mm one, and these 25mm rounds have proximity fuzes that take up room in the projectile body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Brings to mind the old saying about Mechanical engineers make weapons
while Civil engineers make targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Another version...
Fighter pilots make movies, attack pilots make history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yay humanity. Consistently finding new ways to kill each other.
But electric cars? Na, can't have those yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yet, we tell ourselves that we are the epitome of evolution.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. money to kill. no money to heal.
reluctant K&R

:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm still waiting to see Mobile Infantry Armor - as described by Heinlein
in Starship Troopers (and completely ignored in the ST movies, but shown to good effect in Avatar).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. The problem with infantry armor is POWER.
There have been numerous powered suits built for various purposes over the years, and the DoD has already experimented with arming them for combat. They are invariably passed over for one simple reason; infantry must maintain the ability to operate without supply lines for extended periods of time. Infantry armor must be fueled, necessitating solid supply lines to keep them combat ready. The two concepts don't merge well.

I've seen it mentioned, over the past few years, that the DoD is keeping an eye on some of the battery innovations being developed for hybrids and electric cars, because they may also enable them to finally make some of these weapon concepts viable. Better batteries for your Prius may one day enable Armored Infantry units to walk into combat with heavy weapons and missile launchers slung over their shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. That's with a lot of tech.
A power source.

Once we figure out that out, then a world of doors opens up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Talk about evening the battle field, lasers like this could some day
cost effectively eliminate air superiority.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. Disco Fever is REAL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Cockroaches will be victorious in the end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. k and r--bookmarked for later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC