Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fla. Judge Won't Delay Prison For UBS Informant-helped launch a massive US tax evasion investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 05:10 PM
Original message
Fla. Judge Won't Delay Prison For UBS Informant-helped launch a massive US tax evasion investigation
Fla. Judge Won't Delay Prison For UBS Informant

MIAMI -- A federal judge refused Monday to postpone prison or consider a lighter sentence for a former Swiss banker-turned-informant who helped launch a massive U.S. tax evasion investigation into banking giant UBS AG.

The decision by U.S. District Judge William Zloch means Bradley Birkenfeld must report to prison Friday to begin a sentence of three years and four months, which is longer than what prosecutors had sought. Zloch also refused to schedule a hearing on whether to reconsider the sentence. Birkenfeld pleaded guilty last year to a fraud conspiracy charge.

Prosecutors credit Birkenfeld, 44, with exposing wrongdoing at UBS and leading investigators to thousands of suspected American tax cheaters who hid assets in the Swiss bank's accounts. But they also said Birkenfeld failed to disclose his own crimes, including his work for a California real estate magnate who pleaded guilty in 2007 to tax charges.

Prosecutors declined comment on Zloch's ruling. The Washington-based National Whistleblowers Center, whose attorneys are representing Birkenfeld, said in a statement that putting such a prominent informant in prison could "kill the goose that laid the golden eggs" by deterring others from coming forward.

http://www.clickorlando.com/money/22118069/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
icnorth Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is the whole point isn't it?
To deter others from coming forward? The landed gentry are quite upset. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, this puts the kibosh on whistleblowing re banks.
Sure, they guy withheld info; but what he gave was more important -- and what he didn't give emerged anyway based on the investigation he helped spur. Maybe a slap on the hands would have been appropriate, but not a prison sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Zloch is as corrupt as the day is long...links to Rothstein, an all around
asshole of a judge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Still trying to figure how he beat out my wife for "Tax Person of the Year"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Criminals should be in jail.....
...but this guy eventually did the right thing and came forward. His disclosures could make billions for the treasury! I think for his punishment, he should be levied a heavy fine, and that money should come out of any rewards he has coming for being a whistleblower. You can't punish people for coming forward. That only deters anyone from doing it. What was this judge thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC