Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

But Bush/But Repubs...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 07:03 PM
Original message
But Bush/But Repubs...
Has anyone else noticed how many DU'ers use the "But Bush/But RepubS" excuse to justify or excuse almost anything that is done by our current administration or congress? You know the "But Bush started these wars," or "But Bush implemented racist airport screening," or "But Bush tortured," or "But Bush tried to ban gay marriage." Or the "But Repukes bent Congressional rules" or "But Repukes had scandals." I suppose its used to make Obama's more and more conservative politics and our congress's more and more deaf ear to our wishes look less bad, by comparing it to the 8 years before. The problem with this of course is two fold.

FIRST, Bush isn't President. Bush hasn't been President for almost a year. Repubs don't have a majority. Repubs haven't had a majority for a year. How is Bush or his Republican cronies relevant at all to whether Obama chooses whether or not to act progressively? Since Bush and the Repubs were so bad, and we contend that everyone agrees with that, wouldn't it be EASIER for Obama and our Democratically-led Congress to be politically progressive without backlash?

SECOND, we spent the last 8 years ripping Shrub and the Repubs apart as dumb, stupid, arrogant, and even pure evil for doing these things. So what's our excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
denbot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you think us Democrats are "pure evil", what are you doing here?
Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. You don't see the obstructionist game?
Really? You think it should be all smooth sailing for the Obama administration? Really? Are you series?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's not easy to turn the government around. We all would like to
see more changes in the direction of a smarter, more equal,and more peaceful country and world.

We also know that republican capitalistic greed has been deeply entrenched in every aspect of our corrupt cristian culture. We must keep pushing our ideals and work to shine light on any actions seemingly going in the wrong direction,and complain about the maddeningly slow changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maynard Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Replace the word Bush with Clinton
and you will see what the Bush administration did during their 8 years. All mistakes they made were inherited from the Clinton Administration. They used religion to justify their actions. I am a deeply, devout Christian. I attend church on a regular basis. I was very appalled that they would use religion and never take responsibility for their mistakes. They had the idea that all Republicans held hands with God and all misdeeds were justified in order to fulfill their calling from God. Obama was handed a country that was run into the ground by out of control spending and war mongering. It takes awhile to clean up a mess that was 8 years in the making. Remember, it was all Clinton's fault that 9-11 happened on Bush's watch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maynard Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Clinton to blame for 9-11
I remember Cheney saying that Clinton did not convey the threat of Bin Laden to the Bush Admnistration.....and as a result, they did not take the daily briefing seriously....Bin Laden determined to attack in the US. They blamed 9-11 on Clinton. They did not take responsibility for not doing anything to try and prevent 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC