A controversial move to transfer operational control of three secular Denver-area hospitals to a Catholic healthcare system expected to take place on December 31 appears to be on hold pending federal approval.
Looks like the FTC is taking a second look at this move.
From RH Reality Check:
Seething Battle Continues Over Catholic Takeover of Hospitals in DenverBackroom deals, multiple lawsuits and $600 million dollars mark the Sisters of Charity attempt to force religious medical directives on non-sectarian medical centers in Colorado. A controversial move to transfer operational control of three secular Denver-area hospitals to a Catholic healthcare system expected to take place on December 31 appears to be on hold pending federal approval.
The unexpected delay by the Federal Trade Commission to bless the transaction may provide local critics with a last gasp effort to continue fighting the deal. Community members and medical professionals contend the transfer would unfairly subject comprehensive reproductive health and end-of-life care to church doctrine over patients' needs. The Catholic church considers abortion, contraception, elective sterilization and termination of invasive life support as "intrinsically evil" and refuses to provide these medical services or respect patients' advance directives.
I did not realize this was going on.
The disputed takeover in Denver exemplifies the very serious implications for the 127 non-denominational hospitals that succumbed to merger fever with cash-flush Catholic health care systems in the 1990s. According to a study by Catholics for Choice, half of merged secular-Catholic hospitals suspended most or all of their reproductive health care services. Eighty-two percent denied emergency contraception to rape victims -- and more than a third refused to provide a referral.
..."While the cases played out in court and behind closed doors in the private arbitration hearing, Colorado state lawmakers worked to minimize the damage of losing hospital-based reproductive healthcare services.
Issues of religious doctrinal interference in physician-patient decision making came to a head in 2007 when Gov. Bill Ritter signed a law requiring hospitals and pharmacies to provide sexual assault victims information about emergency contraception. However, a conscience clause was added to the bill in order to get conservative Democrats on board after heavy lobbying by the Colorado Conference of Bishops.
Conservative Democrats won this one, it appears.
In a hospital owned by the Catholic church, that "conscience clause" would just about end certain rights of women.
Here is more from earlier in the year:
From the Denver Post:
Sisters of Charity would control three Colorado hospitals under a deal announced Wednesday, a move that would force the hospitals to follow Catholic directivesSisters of Charity would control three Colorado hospitals under a deal announced Wednesday, a move that would force the hospitals to follow Catholic directives regarding health care but lift financial restrictions that have caused improvement projects to languish.
The deal would end a four-year dispute over the sale of Exempla Lutheran in Wheat Ridge and Good Samaritan Medical Center in Lafayette. Kansas-based Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System, which already controls St. Joseph Hospital in Denver, soon would have sole control of all three Exempla hospitals.
..."The nonprofit management and operational structure of the hospitals is complex, and will remain complex if the deal is finalized. But for patients, the change means the Lafayette and Wheat Ridge hospitals would no longer provide abortions, tubal ligations or vasectomies. Also, patients' advocates worry hospital staff would no longer provide emergency contraception or other services now available but in conflict with Catholic directives.
I had not been aware that religious hospitals like these were tax exempt. Yet they can impose their religious views
on women and gays."Keenan and O'Brien said the bishops, in accepting vast federal funding for Catholic hospitals and charities, "never question their own ability to lawfully manage funds from separate sources to ensure that tax dollars don't finance religious practices. Yet they reject the idea that others could do the same. This is the very definition of hypocrisy."
Hypocrisy compounded by what the bishops are doing in Washington, D.C., when it comes to the issue of same-sex marriage, their other primary fixation.
There, the local archdiocese has threatened to shut down its extensive social service programs for the needy if the city goes ahead and legalizes same-sex marriage.
So much for the stated mission of protecting the vulnerable.