So Brit's attempt (tempting?!) Tiger to convert to Pharaseeism, uh Xtianity, is a Scientology-like technique of recruiting celebrities?!1 So Brit COVETS the surface, shallowness of fame for use of his cult?!1 So Brit and O'LOOFAH are SHINING paragons of their cult, and THAT's supposed to be an exemplar for humanity?!1 This shit is really too deep, and not in the sense of "profound."
**********QUOTE********
http://gawker.com/5439804/teabagger-bigwig-had-n+word-signTeabagger Bigwig Had N-Word Sign
The "Tea Party" movement—a frothy mix of angry white populism and well-funded professional political campaigning—is about taking our country back from the socialists, and also about holding up terribly embarrassing signs. Here's one with a really bad word!
And the guy holding the sign? He is Dale Robertson, who is the self-described "President and Founder of the Tea Party." He owns and operates TeaParty.org. So, yes, this is an actual organizer of the movement, and not just some dude. His sign reads, in full: "Congress = Slaveowner / Taxpayer = Niggar." Maybe he thinks he is allowed to use that word if he spells it wrong?
Send an email to Alex Pareene, the author of this post, at alexp@gawker.com.
http://gawker.com/5440096/brit-hume-telling-tiger-woods-to-become-christian-is-not-proselytizingBrit Hume: Telling Tiger Woods to Become Christian Is 'Not Proselytizing'
On Sunday, Fox News analyst Brit Hume urged Tiger Woods to renounce his weird Asian religion and accept Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior. But don't call it proselytizing! Hume appeared tonight on O'Reilly to say this obvious untruth.
Uh huh. Then there is the requisite Clinton bashing and moaning over America's anti-Christian bent. Maybe if you guys stopped proselytizing all the time people would like you more. For example, Hume proselytized even directly after saying he wasn't proselytizing:
*** (quote from Brit: ) "If Tiger Woods were to make a true conversion, we would know it. It would show through in his being. And he would know it, above all. And he would feel the extraordinary blessing that would be. And it would shine because he is so prominent. It would be a shining light. It would be a magnificent thing to witness." ***
The only possible explanation is that Hume thought O'Reilly had asked him if he was "pro-styling." In which case, no. It was not pro-styling. It was proselytizing.
Send an email to Adrian Chen, the author of this post, at adrian@gawker.com.
http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/cindy_adams/this_one_dame_and_half_6bfyJNQ8UdrDSYMfdBiX9OLOU Dobbs' personal Happy New Year letter says, "I'm reaching out in many directions. I will be in the public arena and engaged. I hope to be in touch within the next few weeks." . . .
********UNQUOTE********