Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Saudi woman courts controversy by fantasizing about polyandry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 02:21 AM
Original message
A Saudi woman courts controversy by fantasizing about polyandry
It's scandalous for a Saudi woman to publicly voice a sense of entitlement to equal rights -- but sexual rights in particular? Now, that -- that will bring her a lawsuit, threats, slander and infamy. Such is the case for female journalist Nadine Bedair, who recently penned an article for the Egyptian daily newspaper Al Masry Al Youm titled, "My Four Husbands and I." Mmhm: "My Four Husbands." You hardly have to read beyond the headline to forecast the shitstorm ahead -- but, of course, you'd be missing out on her delightfully daring indictment of polygamy if you didn't.

"Allow me to choose four, five or even nine men, just as my wildest imagination shall choose," Bedair writes. "I'll pick them with different shapes and sizes, one of them will be dark and the other will be blond." Now them's some fighting words. A common defense of polygamy within Islam is that it rescues widows and divorcees from their unfortunate plight by allowing men to welcome multiple women into their homes. But Bedair doesn't buy it: "I have long questioned why it is men have a monopoly on this right. No one has been able to explain to me convincingly why it is I'm deprived of the right to polyandry."

To those who argue that as a woman she "can't handle more than one man physically," she says: "Women who cheat on their husbands and the 'sellers of love' do much more." Translation: Not only are women physically capable of handling more than one man, but, well, many of them would like to. She doesn't stop there: Even if a woman is faithful, it isn't for a lack of sexual frustration, says Bedair. "In fact, she might have not felt one ounce of pleasure since the very first night of this arranged marriage. But traditions and the clerics force her to stay at home and shut up." She ends her article by arguing that either both men and women should be allowed to take multiple spouses or the "map of marriage" needs to be redrawn from scratch.

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2010/01/05/saudi_polygamy/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I always wondered why it was okay to have more wives then husbands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fundamentalist Islamic male nutcases will be out to kill this women for her..........
thoughts and ideas. Come to think of it the fundamentalist Christian male nutcases might be right behind them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now that takes guts.
I sort of agree with what she said in the article - I think marriage should be either completely abolished or open to any number and any mix of genders. (I've always wanted to have three husbands and a wife, even though the probability of me having even one spouse is roughly equal to the probability of me getting hit by lightning on the way to 7-Eleven to cash in a winning lottery ticket.)

I don't think economic discrimination against single people is in any way OK, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. What kind of woman would want to live that kind of nightmare?
Just sayin'

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. the same kind of man that would want four wives? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I can think of at least one guy i'd like to marry...
I just hope my wife likes him too :)

Poly contracts would be a complicated thing. however I wonder if it would do more for the "institution of marriage" than the current system buy allowing people to be open to more possibilities?

Nah, knowing the average person, it would all just go to hell.

Even if poly was made somehow legal, you'd have to be sure to put enough hoops of fire to jump through, so that it would still be special instances only. After all I don't think I could have handled the idea when i was 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. i just would not see any reason to marry, if that was what we were looking at.
i was perfectly happy single and playing. seems about what this would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. There is one person, I truly would love to have in my life in this way
That is, TWO people.
I guess the idea is appealing because of the legal protections, etc, that are extended with "marriage".
There are plenty of couples where one or both partners have their own partner, and/or share a "third".
I can only think of one person who I would trust and care enough for to be our 'third'.
And I suppose that's the point.
Who do you want to open yourself up to completely like you have in a marriage?
To trust to completely that being or hurting will happen, even if it's not meant, but knowing that person loves you and didn't mean to.

Poly is one of those things that seems great from the outside, but when you go more into it, it's rife with peril of the heart.

LOL of course that's all theoretical.
As you know my first is falling apart around my ears so i'll just bow out of this conversation with, if men are allowed, women should be allowed. Fair is Fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, with *average* persons it most certainly would.
I can tell you with some understanding that if any of the individuals are not very above average in emotional and particular philosophical development, it will invariably turn into a leverage game. People with insecurities should never engage in that kind of adult rapport... it ruins it for everyone.

But when we're all fun-loving adults... hey? Who's to complain?

:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. you suggest a woman couldnt possibly want this experience, yet then embrace
the experience.... putting those that participate "above average"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. First, for the humor impaired;
Suggesting that being married to several men would be 'hell' was tongue-in-cheek, and a commentary on MEN.

Second, those that engage in multiple partnerships must be emotionally and psychologically mature for it to work.

That does not mean that those that do not, are not.
If a man or a woman is mature enough, they can handle any type of relationship be it monogamy, polygamy, polyandry, or whatever.


I'm not sure what else you're trying to read into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. i was not trying to 'read" anything into it. seeing a contradiction, i asked
so i wouldnt read anything into it without info.

thanks for clarification

i agree with all your post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. It took me a few minutes, but I see what you were talking about.
The link between 'not being mature' and going through hell with four guys.

I did have to turn my screen a little though. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. actually it was more, not being with four guys
Edited on Fri Jan-08-10 12:44 PM by seabeyond
and then promoting it as positive, "above normal"

and having a profile that isnt gender specific. lol

and then if that is too vague.

saying women, why would they want four men. but being a man, it is a good thing to have four women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Not this man, that's for sure.
I've always been skeptical on the idea of multiple partners. Different strokes for different folks if everyone is consenting but I have my doubts about being able have the same level of feelings for different people.

Plus, the OP's system is inherently unequal to women. They should be allowed more husbands if they wish.

I've been in seriously relationships with all the good points and bad. The bad parts times 4? No thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. The bad parts times 4? No thank you.
boo yah. lol lol

even the good times 4 doesnt make light of that, does it. lol

i see no point. one.... is too much work. lovely. grand. good.... but boy howdy, works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hope she's armed
Cuz the clerics and their followers are going to be gunning for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hope she has other forms of protection as well.
Unless by 'armed' you mean 'drives to work in a tank'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Whatever it takes to keep her safe
She has put a bullseye on herself by speaking out. Tough lady - she has my admiration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm all for it, as long as my wife marries a plumber, electrician, carpenter and a a/c repair man.
Edited on Fri Jan-08-10 11:24 AM by Javaman
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. The only country that allows Polyandry is...
Nepal. Not certain of the arrangement, but believe it is common for a woman to marry brothers.

Geez, this concept might go over big in Utah.

Many of the multiple wives throughout Islam are very young, the newer wives being essentially slaves for the senior wives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Actually, how about a billionaire instead... that might work out.
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Damn, didn't think of that.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugaresa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. How soon before some offended cleric calls for her death because she dares to write
a critical essay about the current state of affairs in her own country.

I am trying to find the article in English right now to read it completely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Brave woman. May she stay safe and keep writing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC