Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Fox News Leaving Geithner Alone? by Cenk Uygur

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:56 AM
Original message
Why is Fox News Leaving Geithner Alone? by Cenk Uygur

Quick question. Why hasn’t conservative media ripped Tim Geithner’s face off yet? He is by far the most incompetent and compromised (nicer than corrupt) member of the Obama administration. There is a mountain of evidence that he has helped his banker friends at the expense of American taxpayers over and over again. He is the Treasury Secretary when the main issue in the country is the state of our economy. And even some Republicans in Congress have gone after him. So, why is Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc. keeping their powder dry?

This is weird. If it was anyone else that had screwed up one tenth of what Geithner has, it would be running on a 24/7 loop on Fox News. Geithner gave away over $62 billion to the top banks in the country in secret, tried to cover it up and at the very least overpaid these banks by $13 billion. And that’s just the latest in a series of scandals, with all the same theme – Geithner gives away taxpayer money to the richest (and most culpable) guys in the country. Ah, there it is.

If the right-wing goes after Geithner, then they’re going after the banks and the billions in taxpayer money they received. The right-wing media in this country have no interest in attacking big money, big corporations or big banks. So, while they’ll talk about how Janet Napolitano should be fired for misspeaking for ten straight days, Geithner is remarkably bullet-proof. Why? Because they actually love what he’s doing.

Watch The Young Turks Here
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/22880

I've heard Larry Kudlow of CNBC say more than once that Geithner was by far the most conservative member of the Obama administration. Kudlow loves him which tells you all you need to know about Timmy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. and daryl issa is someone you should trust? Funny, but except Bloomberg, no one is
I wonder why people they aren't reporting what Bloomberg said today:

1. geitner was NOT on any of those emails or mentioned in any of them
2. geitner recused himself from any investigations concerning AIG

Reporting the story is appropriate, investigating who is involved in this is appropriate, but assuming guilt before knowing the facts, is bullshit

The emails were known for 2 years by issa, grassley, and other repuke thugs. I would like to know why they waited until now to present it?

Congress should find out what happened, and let the chips fall where they may


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. bloomberg must have missed this..
The smoking gun in the AIG – Geithner cover up (in Geithner's own handwriting) In then New York Fed president Tim Geithner’s own handwriting:

"Note that there should be no discussion or suggestion that AIG and the NY Fed are asking to structure anything else at this point."


please see this :


http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/01/the-smoking-gun-in-the-aig-geithner-cover-up.html



thanks to du'er "ozymandius" for this info and article..from this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4214057&mesg_id=4216062
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. And who owns the WSJ?
Edited on Fri Jan-08-10 11:13 AM by randr
This raises a huge question. Is faux deliberately focusing on bullshit issues thus preventing their audience of "concerned Americans" from detecting the stench emanating from the hallowed halls of commerce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. FOX likes slime & Timmy's as slimy as they come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. FOX News plays for the money party n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC