Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drone strikes = worse than suicide bombers = state terrorism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:20 AM
Original message
Drone strikes = worse than suicide bombers = state terrorism
Is there anything MORE cowardly than a drone aircraft, controlled by some guy with a joystick thousands of miles away, shooting a missile at people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. at least some put their ass where their mouth is
and not "play war" like it were a Nintendo game


the more drones we use, the more suicide bombers we're making
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. IEDs killing our troops and innocent civilians would be just as bad
if you weren't biased, you would see that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nope, sorry.
The IEDs are in THEIR country that WE are invading.

Put yourself in their shoes. We are invaded by the Chinese who occupy us. You think our citizens who love our country aren't going to be planting mines to blow up their military vehicles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. LOL Afghanistan is a very loose collection of diverse ethnic groups
To say that they are "defending their country" is ridiculous. Their national identity is tenuous at best. The Taliban are fighting for the same reason we are: power and resources. The war in Afghanistan is one between Warlords (including us) and religious extremists. There are no good sides to this war. We should get out now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If you weren't biased ...
You would not equate drones and IEDs. One is the tool of the invader and the other is the tool of the invaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. we are helping both countries dontchaknow?
Its just a short trip from partisan hack to Just War™ fanboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Everyone is biased. You are biased. If you have a functioning brain, you are biased.
Edited on Sat Jan-09-10 02:19 PM by anonymous171
You cannot dismiss a person's entire argument just because they are "biased."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Maybe if our troops weren't over there illegally occupying their country, IEDs wouldn't be a problem
if you weren't a chickenhawk, you would see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Maybe if they gave up the guy who used airplanes as IEDs
we would not be there? Maybe. Where is this found to be illegal? Just curious. Reality is when please does not work other options may be required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. The more technology it takes, the more righteous the kill
'Just War™' or just wars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe more pictures of Drones and Less Victims will make this thread more popular with DU
Edited on Sat Jan-09-10 11:12 AM by Moochy



bigger payloads!


next generation!


drone blimps!


Oh and something for the little drone pilots in training out there:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1,000
Fucking kewl! They Rock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The distance between the pilot and the act of killing
Edited on Sat Jan-09-10 12:06 PM by Moochy
I've seen it claimed that the central point of UAV's is to remove the pilots from threat of immediate harm, and many of drone operators work in the US, and commute to a base like a day job.

The operator's reaction time overcomes the limitations of distance via advanced networking. That same system also brings the operator closer to the humanity of its targets.

Despite being 13,000 miles away, they still often have more intimate contact with their targets than traditional jet air strikes because of the surveillance before and after the strike.

Hours spent stalking your target, seeing them move about their daily business from overhead angles, launching missile strikes at them , and then verifying the kill. It's not as distant an act of killing as some would make it seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, well put.: State Sponsored Terror - Summary Executions of *suspected* terrorists.
Edited on Sat Jan-09-10 11:20 AM by ShortnFiery
... which includes anyone and everyone who threatens Middle Eastern countries' tin pot dictators Autocratic Rule, and thus, the USA's geopolitical hegemony ====> is *a terrorist* - Taliban and/or al Quaeda, the most evil branch of terrorism. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. The main problem with drones is that they allow our government
(as well as other governments) to attack a country relentlessly without admitting they're starting/fighting a war.

That's the most cowardly thing about drone strikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. We bombed targets in Pakistan at a rate of 1 every 8.2 days last year.
Edited on Sat Jan-09-10 12:33 PM by tekisui
That sounds like war to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Targeting populations known to have innocent people from
thousands of miles away is terrorism, IMO.

Using private contractors to assist should be criminal as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I agree with both of your statements.
Our government likes to pretend it's not a war if you don't set foot in their country. Or at least if you don't send too many troops in and don't really talk about it when you do.

Hey, it's not war, it's Precision Air Raiding Teleguided Intensive Essential Strikes. Or P.A.R.T.I.E.S. for a short n' cheery acronym! C'mon drone strike victims, turn those frowns upside down :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. What about IEDs?
Or guerrilla warfare? during the American Revolution our side using guerrilla tactics wand condemned as cowardly and uncivilized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. First you call it terrorism, then cowardice.
I think you are just trying to throw shit at people. (btw, I agree with your first point. It is terrorism.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Terrorism and cowardice can be simultaneously present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. Whats more cowardly than targetting civilians?
Either intentionally as in the case of terrorists, or unintentionally as in the case of collateral damage from air strikes? Same end result, dead innocents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. At least "our" killers express "regret" when they murder civilians.
“What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy.” - Gandhi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. EXACTLY. And these people think we can "win this 'war''???
How can they ever not hate us when we won't even fight fare?

Drones and similar tactics are the despicable acts of a decaying empire. It's utterly immoral to "fight" this way. I always hated video games. Never quite understood why. I guess I was just prescient. War by video game. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sorry, don't agree, drones don't target civilians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Civilian targets =/= Military targets
Edited on Sat Jan-09-10 02:46 PM by Taitertots
How are you going to equivocate targeting civilians and targeting military targets?

I guess to avoid being "cowards" we need to beat everyone in only hand to hand battles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. Drones don't intentionally target civilians.
That's the difference and why suicide bombers are cowards.

The objective of drone operators is to kill a specific target while suicide bombers try to cause terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Imagine if you neighbor's house suddenly exploded one afternoon
Edited on Sat Jan-09-10 02:49 PM by anonymous171
Would that scare you? Drones are a tool of terror. They may not target civilians, but they sure do kill a lot of them and scare the shit out of countless others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. So do planes and helicopters.
Are pilots cowards and terrorists?

So do tanks and APCs.

Are drivers cowards and terrorists?

They haven't invented a method of warfare where no civilians die. The OP comparing US soldiers to suicide bombers, that asinine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. I would consider it unintentional terrorism then
The idea behind the drones, as far as I understand, is not to terrorize the population. If the intent is to terrorize the population then we have some really fucking stupid people conducting this war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Dead is DEAD none the less. And those dead innocents have family members who will
hate the USA for the rest of their lives. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. And the relatives of the dead soldiers will hate Afghans and Muslims for the rest of their lives.
I'm open to any ideas for warfare that doesn't kill civilians.

This isn't a one-person tango.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. "Is there anything MORE cowardly ?" - NO
.
.
.

All those nintendo pilots deserve nightmares

Ad infinitum

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. A canadian holds the record kill distance with a rifle
no difference, dead is dead. Snipers were not taken as prisoners all that often in the ww's. Killing from distance is part of war, this is a natural evolution. Dont like it, dont fight wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. So every invention past the fist and rock is cowardly?
"All those nintendo pilots deserve nightmares"

Do pilots, tank drivers, APC drivers, artillery men, recon pilots, riflemen deserve nightmares too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC