Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High Court Returns to a Busy Schedule: blockbuster opinions and maybe a retirement greet SCOTUS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 10:27 PM
Original message
High Court Returns to a Busy Schedule: blockbuster opinions and maybe a retirement greet SCOTUS
It wasn't exactly a lost fall for the U.S. Supreme Court, but, as the justices don their robes for the first oral arguments of 2010 starting today, there is a sense that the term is just now beginning to take shape.

Blockbuster opinions, riveting oral arguments and a possible retirement loom in the next six months, all promising to make the Court's first three months in session fade quickly from view...

And then there is the biggest imponderable of all -- the possible retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens by term's end in late June. He has acknowledged hiring only one clerk for next term, and he still seems the most likely to go, though sporadic speculation has justices ranging from Ruth Bader Ginsburg to Antonin Scalia eyeing the exit door.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202437796175


Please let Scalia retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Scalia needs to go big time
The problem is that he probably will try to hold on until 2012 to see if a Repub wins back. Fortunately, I don't see THAT happening but, unfortunately, he will probably cling on to the job for as long as he can as long as the Democrats have the WH and the power to nominate a non-wingnut to SCOTUS to replace him. Once he is gone, the balance of the court won't tilt so heavily rightward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Still waiting to hear if the Supremes will hear Don Siegelman's case.
No reversal without certiorari.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Stevens is picking the right time.
A decent majority in the Senate will get whoever the President wants confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Unless they will start needing 60 for the first time ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. The incorporation of the 2nd Amendment. Won't that be grand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. So glad they will be during Obama's term
What really hurt us was Marshall being so ill he retired before he had a chance to see President Clinton win. If he had only waited. We would have a democratic majority instead of a republican one and Thomas would not be in the court. Think how wonderful that would have been..NO DAMN BUSH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC