Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Egypt Tombs Suggest Pyramids not Built by Slaves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:36 AM
Original message
Egypt Tombs Suggest Pyramids not Built by Slaves
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100110/sc_nm/us_egypt_antiquities_tombs

CAIRO (Reuters) – New tombs found in Giza support the view that the Great Pyramids were built by free workers and not slaves, as widely believed, Egypt's chief archaeologist said on Sunday.

Films and media have long depicted slaves toiling away in the desert to build the mammoth pyramids only to meet a miserable death at the end of their efforts.

"These tombs were built beside the king's pyramid, which indicates that these people were not by any means slaves," Zahi Hawass, the chief archaeologist heading the Egyptian excavation team, said in a statement.

"If they were slaves, they would not have been able to build their tombs beside their king's."

He said the collection of workers' tombs, some of which were found in the 1990s, were among the most significant finds in the 20th and 21st centuries. They belonged to workers who built the pyramids of Khufu and Khafre.

Hawass had earlier found graffiti on the walls from workers calling themselves "friends of Khufu" -- another sign that they were not slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's announcing this like it's new news?
There are already books out on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt Remarque Donating Member (709 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. ummm....right. maybe the smurfs did it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. A team of Israeli archaelogists also shed doubt on there every being a large population of Hebrews
in Egypt. Just so no one presumes this is a little bit of political archaelogy going on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_Unearthed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Abadin roughtly translates not as slaves but covee labor
thanks for confirming what we already kind of knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, I didn't know.
I think this is fascinating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is fascinating since the symbolic story of the Exodus
has a good chance of never actually happening.

(Just don't tell this to my fundy brother, for example)

Now I love the symbology of passover, the message is universal... but with all this archeology I have my doubt it actually happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. It likely has its roots somewhere in history.
Following the biblical model, the Israelites really were people fleeing famine in Canaan who migrated into Egypt.. .And found themselves being counted as Egyptians, expected to pay taxes, expected to worship with the state religion, and expected to join the other Egyptians on work teams such as what did build the pyramids.

In Bible-speak, they were slaves because they were expected to conform to the kingdom they had migrated to, rather than that kingdom conforming to them.

The actual exodus was probably more akin to race riots in eastern Egypt or something, leading to a bunch of Israelites packing loot across the desert in a hurry. where do you think they got all that gold to make an idol to Hathor? :)

Another theory was that the "Israelites" were actually exiles from Egypt after the dissolution of the Amarna heresy - Aten worship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. And yet another theory has the tribes, loosely as I can use that name
take over the Heezreel Valley from the hills, with Egypt only as a distant master, in the collective memory. This one is gaining quite a bit of archeological adepts too.

Oh and the story of Genesis is a reflection of politics of the oh seventh century BCE, while Exodus is a parable of a local king trying to shake off that Egyptian fly. Not easy to do when the fly is an elephant.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmondine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. What's the difference between the pyramids and the White House
The White House was built by slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. !
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. OK.. remind me.. were they built by Kellog Brown and Root, Halliburton or Bechtel?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is not new...
But it is interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Given the enormous manpower required to construct the ancient monuments, it
is clear that large populations of workers were involved, and that there would have been a substantial organization apparatus required for logistical purposes: to plan the work, to feed the workers, and so on

The presence of some comparatively high-status tombs associated with the monuments is therefore to be expected and does not imply all workers were valued and accorded status for their work

Much of the work must have been quite dangerous, offering considerable chance of serious injury, considering the size of the building blocks and the relatively unsophisticated technology available. Throughout history, such dangerous work has generally been relegated to lower status workers

It is a mistake to assume that ancient "slavery" was always comparable to its antebellum American counterpart: nothing prevents, for example, a social system in which "slaves" can obtain relatively high status: this was possible, for example, in the Roman imperial era. Thus, a high-status tomb may not necessarily indicate a "free" person

Finally, the status of the conscripted serf is not "free." For the period of conscription, the individual may effectively be a slave, without many social rights: insisting that the person is not a "slave" but merely a "conscripted peasant" might be a distinction without a difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. As evidence that the tomb-builders were not always treated well, notice the so-called
"strike" during the time of Ramses III:

... During Ramesses III's massive construction programme at Thebes a strike was recorded. In the summer of Ramesses' 29th year (c. 1165 BC), the scribe Amennakhte delivered a formal complaint about the situation to the Temple of Horemheb, part of the large administrative complex of Medinet Habu. The letter stated 'One and a half khar of grain <about 168lbs> have been taken from us ... we are dying, we cannot live...'. Although a payment was soon forthcoming, the poor conditions continued and later that same year the two gangs stopped work and marched to one of the royal mortuary temples where they staged what would now be called a sit-in. This action was repeated on the following day within the compound of another temple, until the complaints were recorded and sent to the administrators of Thebes ... http://www.ancient-egypt.co.uk/Deir%20el%20Medina/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. I had understood....
...that the labor for the pyramids had come from peasant farmers that had free time during the growing season. Well, I guess "down time" would be more accurate... between harvesting and planting.

And have you seen this?

http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/newpage1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. That's interesting.
His idea seems to be better than the 'aliens did it' theory of ancient construction.:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not as exciting, though...
Much more fun to imagine antigrav sleds and tractor beams
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. Workers' tombs at Giza have been found before
and the whole "pyramids built by slaves" was debunked years ago. Zahi Hawass can be an idiot and I'm afraid that this latest pronouncement is one of those times. Of course I realized he had jumped the shark when I went to the perfectly dreadful Tutankhamen exhibit that came to the states three or so years back and saw "Official Zahi Hawass fedoras" for sale in the gift shop. Yeah, just the souvenir I want to bring home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is not news, it's been known for many, many years.
Tombs of workers and inscriptions of work teams have been known since the 19th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC