|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 07:41 AM Original message |
Yeah it's Politico. I only hope it's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
1. THat would be a good move . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 07:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. done. sorry about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. Let's mount an effort to save an unpopular guy who's the best player on the opposing team! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 07:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. damn straight they should go to bat for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. The guy's a goner in 2010 -he has 33% approval -and 52% disapproval |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:25 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. agreed. he's very unlikely to win re-election this year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Easing him out and replacing him with someone like Durbin would be a big net positive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:33 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I'd prefer Durbin, but easing Reid out now- over this- is a very bad idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:05 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. +1 Yes, they wouldn't do that for any progressive and/or liberal democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I agree, he is ineffectualy and unprincipled. But without a viable Dem to primary him, he's our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
5. save his career ? politico is at it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:04 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. look, either what they're reporting is factual or it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
10. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
13. Eleanor Holmes Norton also made a statement in support of Reid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Good. hey, bigtree, read the LA blog post by Sandy Banks that I just posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
16. I hope they fight with the same vigor they showed for the public option. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
17. Good for them, I hope this whole thing blows up in the GOP's bigoted faces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
18. Yawn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC