Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Halperin's Greatest Hits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:06 PM
Original message
Mark Halperin's Greatest Hits
I thought it would be timely to remind DU of some of the other things Mark Halperin has reported in the past.


Mark Halperin Blows Obama VP Story, Then Covers It Up

Hey, kids! Late yesterday evening, Mark Halperin, who writes "The Page" for Time Magazine - which is like a comic book, full of listicles for children - had up on "The Page" a post that, in his Halperin-y way, suggested or spitballed that Obama had chosen his Veep, and that Veep was Dick Lugar. It was titled "Hoosier Values" and read:

What is Barack Obama looking for in a running mate?


"Obama tells TIME he wants someone who is "not about ego, self-aggrandizement, getting their name in the press" and tells CBS News he wants someone he would "feel comfortable with."

Obama at Saddleback: "There are people like ... Dick Lugar, a Republican, who I'd listen to on foreign policy."

On CNN this past Sunday: BLITZER: "Do you agree with Senator Lieberman that Senator Obama has not put the country first?"

LUGAR: "No. I think that was clearly a partisan statement at a rally. I respect everybody their opinions in a political campaign, but that's all that was."

To see what the future could look like, click here."

Dick Lugar, of course, has endorsed John McCain for President. A brief amount of time passed, and then Halperin took the confounding post down, and there has been no mention of it since then. No update, no correction.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/22/mark-halperin-blows-obama_n_120543.html


Or who could forget this amazing piece of work

Mark Halperin's Mary Landrieu Photoshop: Pure Class


As many of you know, Mark Halperin is this babbling idiot whom Time magazine hired to cobble together this insipid web product called "The Page," which is designed to scam people looking for trenchant, up-to-the-minute political news into giving Time many, many unnecessary ad impressions as you follow Halperin's teasing links to his content. That content tends to be a really dumb listicle, or a one sentence piece of pure and unadulterated banality, or, if you are really lucky, a paragraph or two of analysis that's either so conventional as to appear slam-dunk, or so witless that it's completely laughable and wrong.

There are never any consequences for this terrible content, because the end result is that Time gets to serve ads to sponsored links, like the one I'm reading now that says, "'DO NOT Bleach Teeth' 1 simple trick, discovered by a mom, dentists DON'T want you to know."

But the other feature of "The Page" are the exceedingly juvenile photo illustrations that Halperin provides for his stories. For example! Take Mary Landrieu! She's a moderate Democrat from Louisiana who was holding out on health care reform until she accepted a porky deal that would bring an additional $100 million of Medicaid subsidies to her state. There are lots of ways to serve up this news story! And there are lots of creative ways to put it together for web trawlers. How about, "Mary, Mary, quite contrary?" or, if you're old-school retro, "Mary, Mary, why you buggin'?" Or you could just decide that the best thing to do is be straight about it. Not Halperin, though! Here's the imaginative Photoshop that went along with his "story."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/24/mark-halperins-classy-pho_n_369273.html


What about this sweet one
Mark Halperin Exasperated By Obama's "Bad Makeup Job," Declares It "Horrible" (VIDEO)


During an interview on Katie Couric's webcast following Wednesday night's debate, Time political analyst Mark Halperin rebuked Barack Obama's makeup not once, but twice.

"I thought Obama looked bad," he admonished. "If the person who did his makeup tries to touch his face again, he should slap them away."

He then went on to talk about more substantive matters, only to return to the subject of makeup a few minutes later. "Again, tired and a bad makeup job. You may not understand this Katie, but for some people on-camera, tired and a bad makeup job..." he then threw his hands in the air, and in a sing-song voice declared the whole situation "horrible!"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/16/mark-halperin-exasperated_n_135360.html



Halperin's Take: SCOTUS Focus




1. The reason that “white men need not apply” for the soon-to-be-open Supreme Court seat is because, unlike President Bush 43, Barack Obama can choose among a lot of supremely qualified women and non-white men who match his view of what an outstanding candidate for the job should be— and sources say that is the direction he plans to go.

http://thepage.time.com/halperins-take-scotus-focus/


Obama Gets "Very Flirtatious" At Campaign Stop

Via Mark Halperin, the pool report from Obama's campaign stop in Allentown, Pennsylvania:

It may be April Fools Day, but Sen. Barack Obama was acting like it was Valentine's Day. He was in full charm mode while touring the Tama Manufacturing plant, a JC Penny supplier of made-in-the-USA clothing in Allentown.


Obama was especially flirtatious today, winking and grinning at the female workers who were swooning behind their cell phone cameras. Tama President Mark Fogelman told quality inspector Carol Davis not to be nervous when she talked to Obama, even though he was "only the next
president" greeting her. Obama smiled ear to ear as he looked at her work, saying: "These look pretty comfortable, this is all pretty leisure wear."

After the presidential hopeful walked away, Davis let out a "Whoo!" and fanned herself.

"It got hot in here. He ain't bad looking either," she told your pooler.

"I hope he wins," Davis said, adding she was not registered to vote. "I wish all of them good luck, just bring the troops home is all." During the 25-minute tour, Obama called a woman "sweetie," and thanked her in spanish, then told another woman who let him know she is from Thailand, "I love Thai food."

But Obama lavished compliments on dancewear manufacturer Marisa Cerveris, who gave him a black and pink leotard for Malia and Sasha, explaining she was once in the New York City ballet. "You look like you might be a dancer," Obama told her, later adding: "You're big time."

"You're gorgeous," he told Cerveris after glancing at one of her old ballet photos.

"I was," she replied.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/01/obama-gets-very-flirtateo_n_94477.html


Mark Halperin Somehow Concludes McCain Won The Week

First Posted: 09-18-08 01:40 PM | Updated: 10-19-08 05:12 AM

Okay. I was alive this past week, and I couldn't help but notice that the following things occurred:

* The economy collapsed, putting McCain's party at a distinct disadvantage.
* McCain, nevertheless, said the "fundamentals of our economy are strong."
* Then he said they weren't.
* Then he said that by "economic fundamentals" he meant "workers," a definition no one else in the world uses.
* McCain's response initially was a big government approach to fighting greed.
* Followed by a small government approach to fighting regulation.
* Prominent conservatives like David Brooks, Chuck Hagel and Charles Krauthammer, threw a big wet blanket on McCain for his choice to put Sarah Palin on the ticket.
*snip*

After that sort of week, one might expect that the negative poll trends that bedeviled Obama in the run out from the Republican National Convention would begin to reverse themselves. And, you know what? They have.

BUT FORGET ALL THAT. Because Mark Halperin, over at his Kooky Komic Book Of Politics, sees it differently: "Obama Closes Strong, But McCain Wins The Week." Which raises one question. Why is Mark Halperin TOTALLY BOGARTING THE PINEAPPLE EXPRESS HE'S SMOKING?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/18/mark-halperin-somehow-con_n_127512.html





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1.  the guy is famous!
he`s famous so we must believe he`s telling the truth!

it`s amazing how many people buy his bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Audrey Kawasaki! Nice! n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. one of my fav`s...
i wish i had the coins to buy her work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You mean like this one?
I got a printer's proof of this from a guy in Japan (original purchaser from Pressure Printing). Many coins, but happy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. someday i`ll buy a print.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Looks like you'll have a good chance on Jan. 23rd. See her site. n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I've always thought he was a wanker, but I do think well of Heilemann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Dunno...
Lie down with dogs, and it's very likely you're a dog, yourself. Else, how would you find it palatable to lie down with a dog like Halperin? Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. think about this, honeypie: Go cheney yourself, hard. if you're capable of it, dumpling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Get something for your hemmorhoids; they're making you cranky.
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 05:09 PM by burning rain
By the way, cali, I meant "you" generically and shading toward Heilemann, not you you. But maybe you're finding that the shoe fits, and in that case, what can I say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's the implication here?

Are you suggesting that he misquoted Reid? :shrug:


Reid already apologized for his racist comment, so obviously the quote wasn't made up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Reid apologized so yes it was obviously true
and I am sure there are other things in the book that are true. But it is important to put anything Halperin reports in its proper context and understand that Halperin has an agenda, I thought that it was very telling that other than the Palin tidbit all of the negative things in the book that have come out so far have been about Dems. (Bill Clinton, Harry Reid, John Edwards, Barack Obama).

I have been a bit surprised at all the attention this book is getting today on DU and people automatically believing everything in it as a foregone conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gels Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. As soon as I saw Halperin was involved
I figured most of it was a crock, Typical work of a hack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I read the excerpt on John Edwards in NY magazine this morning
There is an incident where Edwards is talking to Obama on the phone about making this deal with him to be his AG (which has been reported elsewhere), and in the exchange Edwards is stressing to Obama to focus on poverty, and Obama counters with "yeah, yeah yeah I care about the poor" as if he is dismissing poverty. I couldnt help but wonder, how does Halperin and the co author know that and was that put in the book to make Obama look bad.

If I were to read the book I would always be thinking about this kind of thing. What is the agenda with the author given his reporting in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. It's not a dismissal of poverty, it's a dismissal of EDWARDS (who wanted to
be VP, AG, or whatever, as long as it was in the administration).

http://nymag.com/news/politics/63045/index8.html

The trouble with Obama, from Edwards’s point of view, was his refusal to get transactional. When Edwards told Obama that he wanted him to make poverty a centerpiece of his agenda, Obama airily replied, Yeah, yeah, yeah, I care about all that stuff. Clinton, by contrast, proposed that she and Edwards do a poverty tour together, even suggested that Edwards would have “a role” in her administration. Edwards still had his eye on becoming attorney general, and thought the odds of getting that plum were better with Hillary than with Obama. But after South Carolina, the chances of Clinton claiming the nomination just kept falling—and Edwards didn’t want to back a loser.

Read more: An Excerpt From John Heilemann and Mark Halperin's 'Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime' -- New York Magazine http://nymag.com/news/politics/63045/index8.html#ixzz0cKqE2lZx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Its not how it reads
at least to me, especially knowing Mark Halperin's other inane reporting on Obama during the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. That's how it reads to me. He points out how Edwards was dismissed by Obama, but
not by Clinton, who even promised him some part in the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I wonder--does he mention Cillizza & Milbank in his credits?
*snicker*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. And I guess my question to you would be "who cares if it is true"?
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 01:53 PM by spiritual_gunfighter
The quote wasnt hateful. It was insensitive, but in terms of politics it was true. Obama forgave him, it should be over. But obviously it wont be because what a great way for Republicans to make hay out of a non issue and derail HCR in the process than to jump all over this.

Maybe we shouldn't feed into this horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree. Clearly, Repugs only make an issue out of this because...

...they want to obstruct, derail and sabotage everything that Dems do. It's a 100% partisan thing for them.

Not that I'm thrilled with Reid by any stretch of imagination, but... It's ridiculous to demand his resignation over this, it would only weaken Obama (and that is exactly why they are doing this).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. bingo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The Tree gang needs to get unstuck from that groove. You guys do have
original thoughts, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. what do you even mean by this comment?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. What's the Tree gang? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Did you just watch Petar Pan and finding yourself upset with the plot?
I thought the Lost Boys were to obsessed with Pirates and Capn Hook for my taste. I think the director could have offered more social commentary.

I thought it was lazy on his part to portray young homeless children as a bunch of vagabonds living in a tree plotting on killing adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC