Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Healthcare Loophole: No discrimination against pre-existing conditions is out the window!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:05 PM
Original message
The Healthcare Loophole: No discrimination against pre-existing conditions is out the window!


The Ensign Healthcare Loophole
posted by Greg Kaufmann
January 8, 2010

Taken at face value, Senator John Ensign's amendment which was included in the final Senate healthcare bill sounds pretty decent: by meeting "wellness" standards people can receive discounts on their employer-based healthcare premiums. Stop smoking--pay less. Hit a certain weight--pay less. Meet a cholesterol target--you get the idea.

Dems probably should have stopped and realized since the amendment was offered by Ensign it probably wasn't motivated by "wellness" at heart.

In fact, it allows premiums to be raised from current levels, and then "discounts" would reduce the premiums to current rates. People who don't meet the insurance companies' targets could pay up to 30 percent more for coverage, roughly $4000 based on the average cost of family coverage. The amount could increase to 50 percent which is over $6,600 for a family.

There is also the problem that this is biased against people with a genetic predisposition to high blood sugar, hypertension, high cholesterol, being overweight and a host of other often hereditary conditions. It's also biased against a lower-income person working two to three jobs to pay the bills, who has to stop and chow down some fast food between jobs rather than get to the gym where he or she can't afford a membership anyway. It's even biased against communities that don't have grocery stores where they can find fresh fruits and vegetables.

So what does this all mean? Remember a central promise of healthcare reform--even the watered down version--how people with preexisting conditions weren't supposed to be denied coverage or forced to pay more for their insurance? That all sounded pretty good, right? Well, guess again.

"Incentives quickly become penalties for those who cannot meet the target," said Sue Nelson, vice president for federal advocacy at the American Heart Association (AHA). The AHA has led a coalition of more than 200 health and consumer organizations who oppose this Senate provision, including the National Organization for Women, American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and many mental health groups. "A wellness program could consist solely of a premium surcharge based on a blood cholesterol count over 200. are significant potential unintended consequences such as burdening sicker employees and their families with significant increases in healthcare costs thereby making coverage unaffordable for those who need it the most."

Read the full article at:

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion/514042/the_ensign_healthcare_loophole

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only if people don't speak up. Urge your reps to remove it from the bill!
That's what your headline should have said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. We have been. It seems we are being pretty much ignored, but, we should continue our efforts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Yeah we should call and urge their support
of the Insurance Company Profit Enhancement and Protection Act of 2010. We should thank them for making sure our precious health insurance companies will not have to suffer any loses by having to pay claims.

We should reward their willingness to sacrifice us to the greater corporate good by sending them money and voting for them over and over because they are after all better than the alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
44. What you said.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. But, but. We were told to shut up.
Right after we were told that the admin wanted to hear from us, we were told to shut up and stop agitatin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. What's the point of including Republican amendments, anyway??

"The spirit of bipartisanship"?? :wtf: None of them are going to vote for this bill, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. They accepted literally HUNDREDS of Republican amendments
and thats aside from the Republicans with a (D) beside their names.

They did it because this is the bill they wanted or have you forgotten the "Gang of Sev...err...six, after Hatch bounced"? Liberals and all but one moderate were excluded because they wanted a corporatist/"centrist" bill not a liberal, moderate, or even a conservative market reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can anyone still defend this worthless piece of shit bill?
Seems that the supposed elimination of "pre existing conditions" was the justification most of the apologists were using here to still call this steaming pile of shit "reform".


Now what?

Seriously, can anybody come up with a single logical reason as to why this fucking joke should pass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I can! It will keep insurance company claim adjusters working!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Nah, they could always work for the government entity that administered the PO/single payer
The insurance criminal executives would be out of work, of course, but I don't think they're going to be standing in the soup lines any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. True, however they wouldn't be able to deny sick people medical treatment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well, if they really get off on denying requests
they could always transfer over to the budget office and start reviewing "defense" contracts. Plenty of room for denials there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What, and help the terriorists and not support our troops?

Are you some sort of pinko terriorist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. I can't! This is the biggest piece of fucking crap I've read this week
I am SO pissed off right now. We disregarded EVERYTHING to get pre-existing conditions put in.

This should NOT pass then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuart68 Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
39. It's historic !
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 08:24 PM by stuart68
We're making history ! An historic POS, but history none the less...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SandWalker1984 Donating Member (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. The facts are in - we've been screwed --- by Democrats!
The more information that comes out on the Senate bill, the worse it becomes.

The health insurance industry is still exempt from anti-trust legislation.

Loopholes to get around charging more for pre-existing conditions.

NO public plan to provide even a sliver of competition.

No meaningful regulation or cost controls on premiums.


Oh yeah, there are the MANDATES to force every American to buy garbage plans, with high deductibles, with high copays, that probably will do everything in their power to deny claims and pay little if you actually can afford to use the insurance.

But hey, the White House doesn't think we are going to remember in 2010 or 2012 elections what they've done to us.


Want to take that bet to Vegas?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenMetalFlake Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. 6 of 1, half a dozen of the other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kill this fucking bill. Kill it now. This is a disgrace, it really is.
Who do they think we are? Idiots? Chumps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. No, they think we're sheep.
Coming blindly to slaughter. Doing whatever they say. Drooling at their feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. This bill is such a mess.
Anyone in the private sector would have done the only reasonable thing: they would have thrown it out and started over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. The "Wellness Standards" are crap.
Aside from pre-existing conditions...there should absolutely not be any additional charges or higher rates for people who smoke, are obese, or whatever. If that happens then people who ride motorcycles should pay more, people who ride bikes should pay more, people who ski should pay more, people who put salt on their food should pay more, people who walk their dogs at night should pay more...and on and on and on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwixVoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Jesus christ on a cross
WTF?

This was one of the few good things.

This is nothing more than a cash BAIL OUT to health insurance corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. which is exactly what it was always intended to be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. +1
CHANGE! :silly: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. It always has been.... Why else would Obama start out with what he hoped to get in the end?
When you start out with what you hope to finally get in the end, it will be compromised and conceded down to NOTHING beneficial for the American People and a lottery jackpot for the Insurance Industry in the end.

Obama KNEW there would have to be compromises and concessions along the way, yet he started out with what he had hoped to get in the end anyway, instead of starting out with the most any American could ever hope for with room to negotiate down.

It is a disgraceful scam being played on the American People by the New DemoRAT Party, which is the DLC. After all, the Democratic Party had a mandate and large majorities in Congress to get REAL Health Care Reform.

I will never accept the bullshit line that 'this is the best we could do,' because it's a LIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is not only another huge loophole to allow denials of care or price gouging
it is also a huge hit on privacy rights. This amendment is only possible because of Bush's last minute executive order that allows employers the right to your private health information. This was an executive order I would have expected a Democratic president to have immediately reversed. I called the White House, today, and said so. The gentleman with whom I spoke was very nice and after telling him I had been worried about this amendment for several weeks he asked what I thought of the bill overall. I told him if the bill was not significantly changed from the Senate version, specifically the 'cadillac plan tax' removed, the community ratings model from the House bill adopted, the loopholes for rescissions closed, there was no way I felt the country would be better off than they are now. He then asked if I would prefer no bill to the Senate bill and I responded that, as hard as it was for me to say after 25 years as an RN and 36 years a registered Democrat, I would have to say I would prefer no bill to passing the bill from the Senate as it stands. We talked some more and I explained that I felt the insurance companies are entering a time of eventual demise if we do nothing and that if we do not pass the bill they will have to come back to us, within a very few years, and ask us to reform the system to save them. I was on the phone for about 45 minutes with him and he kept saying. "Wow, you're very well informed." I ended by saying the election of this president who I supported in the caucuses and the general election had been one of the happiest and most hopeful moments of my life since we lost Bobby Kennedy and that this move to the right on the HCR bill had dashed all my hopes for the American people to ever have a responsive and affordable health care system and that I hoped the president would consider putting some of his weight behind the better provisions in the House bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. was he going to take that all to the President?

are you even sure he was actually listening to you for the entire 45 minutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm sure he was listening because he was asking follow up questions
which were pertinent to the comments I was making. Of course he said he would let the President know of my comments but what does that really mean? Anyway, it was different than other calls I've made where there was something of air of indifference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
43. Great work!
I'm impressed. Now that's effective citizen participation. It's a shame we have to spend 8000 or whatever hours of our precious time to understand these complex issues and call BS on our reps when that's what we're paying THEM to do, but that's what it's come to. Anyone capable of doing so and actually going for it has my highest respect.

I make calls now and then, nothing to this extent though, usually just make a couple of points, feel pretty silly thinking that anyone even listens, and go on my way.

If you can really get into the detail level with them like this, one thing it does for sure is it lets them know that there are people out here who are truly paying attention, and it may put that little inkling of accountability in their minds when they're making policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. ******OBAMA HAS A 3rd ARM ATTACHED TO HIS LEG!!!****** I'm just as factual as this artcle
...seeing there's no bill that has been passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Well, of course, there is no bill passed yet but after watching this debate since July
and hearing, at every step, to calm down because there's no final bill and watching one awful proposal after another make it into the bill, that just isn't working anymore. The amendment is in the Senate bill. It was left in there through the writing of the blended bill and the debate following that. The House will, likely, be forced to cave on most of their issues and we are likely to see the Senate bill with one or 2 small changes. Of course, there is a possibility of defeating the bill but if it passes I fully expect this to be left in unless there is a public outcry of some magnitude. Hell, 70% of the public wanted a PO and we can't have it. So, BOHICA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. What points do you disagree with in the article? We all know the Senate bill was passed by
the Senate with 60 votes and may be subject to some minor changes during discussions with the House leadership so what's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Again with the caps as if caps make bad law into good policy
If only, if only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. Perhaps they might sneak single payer in at the last second?
Safe money is on pre-existing conditions being penalized even after this bill is passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. So now we can only comment on bills that have been passed.
What's next? We can't comment until they're SIGNED? IMPLEMENTED? REVISED?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paper Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
30. This decision will make things even worse. Those if fear of losing
all they have because of a pre-existing condition will not go to the Doctor because they fear the bill.

This healthcare bill is like a recipe. If you keep tinkering with the good parts and changing it around, you run the risk of making such a mess that it should be thrown out. Start over with the good, and don't tinker with it. Maybe then the end result would be worth serving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
31. Yayyyyy!!!!
Yayyyyy!!!!

Please, sir, pile more shit on my head! Put more lead weights in my already strained backpack!!! Please, make my legs lame, to make it that much more difficult to live!!!!
Please, force me to pay a higher company store tax!!!

Yayyyyy!!!!

Orwell was an optimist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
32. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rozlee Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. Why the hell did I go panting so enthusiastically to the polls for early voting
back in Nov. 08? If I'd known then what I know now, I would have stayed in bed.



:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shopgreen Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. you had HOPE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
35. Is there anything left in this bill?


k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Yes. You're still required to buy it. And if you've got good benefits, to pay taxes on it.
So, yeah, there's still some benefit there. If you're an insurance company stockholder anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
40. The whole damned idea behind health insurance is *shared risk*!
To *encourage* people to wellness is one thing; to penalize them so much they can't afford health care is draconian, criminal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
41. it was bogus anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC