Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Umm…Clinton May Not Have Said Racially-Charged “Getting Us Coffee” Quote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:42 AM
Original message
Umm…Clinton May Not Have Said Racially-Charged “Getting Us Coffee” Quote
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 10:09 AM by kpete
Umm…Clinton May Not Have Said Racially-Charged “Getting Us Coffee” Quote

Bill Clinton is catching a huge amount of flack for supposedly having belittled Barack Obama by telling Ted Kennedy something like, “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.”

But it’s worth noting that there’s pretty good cause to believe he may not have said this.

The claim about Clinton’s explosive remarks came on page 218 of Game Change:

***The day after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making the case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a manner that deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a friend, Teddy fumed that Clinton had said, A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.

The remark is not in quotes. And the authors’ note from Mark Halperin and John Heilemann states explicitly their rationale for choosing not to put dialog in quotes:

Where dialog is not in quotes, it is paraphrased, reflecting only a lack of certainty on the part of our sources about precise wording, not about the nature of the statements.


This is kind of amazing. By the authors’ own stated guidelines, this might not have been the “precise wording” Clinton used. Yet it has been the basis for a huge amount of media discussion all the same, with some suggesting racism on Clinton’s part.

more:
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/umm-clinton-may-not-have-said-racially-charged-getting-us-coffee-quote/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why do I get the feeling there is a lot of paraphrasing in that book?
Someone heard someone who had heard someone repeat what someone had told them. That's what is in the book??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gee, I'm stunned that.
the bottom feeders at politico would paraphrase something to cast the worst possible light on Bill Clinton. Stunned, I tell ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. The media spins it however they want regardless of how it is in the book -
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 10:02 AM by stray cat
but we all know Bill thought Obama was still wet behind the ears and not worthy to challenge Hillary. After all he implied McCain and Hillary were up for the job but not som much for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. That is exactly what it was
No racism involved. Just political elitism. He is a former president talking to a senator with decades of establishment experience, not to mention that he was the brother of a former president, and in the family that America considers political royalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. It is really hard to believe that Clinton would have said such a thing
Someone is making shit up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why are people getting so hyped up about this book?
Seems to be that most of it is unsourced or hearsay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. We have to fight back, because it's being pushed as god's truth by the media.
Huge flackery going on to promote this thing. Many of us right here at DU have been pointing out the fact that the book is unsourced and hearsay but the media won't have it that way. It is being accepted as the truth by the media and there simply has to be a pushback...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Republicans hold no regard for truth or accuracy and they use implication for
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 10:06 AM by peacetalksforall
the truth they need to push the buttons of gullible people who care even less about truth and accuracy.

Are these guys Republican heavy?

Clinton seems to have a life long reputation as a friend to Black Americans.

I don't think it is the kind of statement that anyone would voice to Ted Kennedy.

I prefer to doubt the authors, the editors, and the publisher and will remember them with a certain level of dirt. It should have been edited out.

The person who told them should step forward to support them, if they all still defend their accuracy.

This is the rotteness of this country updated to this very week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karia Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. I do not believe it
The "source" is supposedly an unnamed friend of Ted Kennedy (deceased). It is way too easy to make sh*t up when Ted Kennedy is not alive to say, "Hey! I never said that Bill said that!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. I wrote in another post that there is no way to verify that
horrific accusation since Kennedy is dead. ReTHUG hacks hate Bill Clinton and I honestly do not believe he said those words. The Clintons exposed their hypocritical asses and they have no plan of getting over that fact. Note I was never in the Hillary camp but enough of these non-stop BS attempts to destroy Dems by ReTHUG hacks.

Fugg this shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Why is nobody asking Mrs. Kennedy?
One would think that if anyone would know why her husband chose to back Mr. Obama, she would. I think the rethug media is afraid to do that, because if the truth comes out, they would have to find some other thing with which to bash the Dems.

I also question whether Bill Clinton used those words. If he did, it was political elitism, as others have suggested, not racism. I can imagine he would say the same of Sen. Franken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Who was it who called Obama "the black candidate" after Obama won the S.Carolina primary?
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 10:31 AM by invictus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. .
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 10:30 AM by invictus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. Given Bill's record, it's very easy to believe he said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Sometimes we say things in frustration/desperation that do not come from the heart.
I do not for a second believe Bill Clinton is a racist but it would not surprise me in the least if he said something approximating what is stated in the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. I don't give a flying fig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bill Clinton is a lot of things, but racist is not one of them. He is competitive though...
... and has a temper behind all that charm.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. For those with CDS, quotes, paraphrases, and imagined statements are all true.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yup.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. What part of ...
"...nature of the statements." can you not understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. The entire book is nothing but a bunch of gossip and inuendoes
unblemished by footnotes or identified sources. We should believe none of it, no matter how tempted (even the Palin stuff has to be taken with a grain of salt.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks for posting this.
K & R :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC