Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prop 8 trial - cross examination of Prof. Cott from Harvard (history of marriage expert)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:49 PM
Original message
Prop 8 trial - cross examination of Prof. Cott from Harvard (history of marriage expert)
on the stand is Harvard Prof. Nancy Cott, marriage history expert.

follow here... http://twitter.com/NCLRights



Thompson grilling cott on article she wrote 34 yrs ago! He is trying to prove that religion has shaped marital law.
-----

Thompson seems to be trying to establish that american marriage law is based on christianity.
-----

Thompson still talking about "christian moral principles" being "reflected" in marriage law. And now he is invoking edmund burke.
-----

Thompson now tormenting prof cott with absurd questions abt whether gay men can marry lesbians.
-----

Thompson saying that the "disestablishment" of traditional marriage has led to resurgence of polygamy.
-----

Thompson now saying doma is evidence that traditional marriage has not been disestablised. Quoting doma sponsors
----

Trying to get her to say that andrew sullivan's anthology is "the best resource" on arguments pro & con marriage equality
-----

Thompson now trying to get prof cott to say that letting ss couples marry will lead to end of gender differentiation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. faux should send their expert analyst sarah palin to cover this issue
Her insight would be awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. re-direct....
http://twitter.com/NCLRights


re-direct...

Redirect. Prof cott talking abt history of state's use of marriage laws to penalize disfavored groups & dictate marriage roles.
-----

Prof cott, marriage is a basic civil right. Marriage is a flexible institution, has shed attributes of inequality.
-----



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. more...
http://twitter.com/NCLRights


Prof c, changes in marriage cited by blankenhorn (fewer marriages, more nonmarital kids) unrelated to ss couples marrying.
-----

Prof c, it is in public interest for ss couples to be able to marry.
-----

Prof cott, letting ss couples marry will not open door to polygamy. Monogamy deeply engrained in american political tradition
-----

Prof cott, likewise, letting ss couples marry does not jeopardize restrictions on incest.
-----

Prof cott, we r multireligious society, separating religious & civil marriage is essential to respecting that religious diversity
-----

Final word from prof cott, letting ss couples marry would be beneficial to marriage.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. wow. Thank-you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hope the good Prof schools him...looks like he is.
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. She is doing very well, I believe.
here is more...

http://twitter.com/NCLRights


Prof c, changes in marriage cited by blankenhorn (fewer marriages, more nonmarital kids) unrelated to ss couples marrying.
-----

Prof c, it is in public interest for ss couples to be able to marry.
-----

Prof cott, letting ss couples marry will not open door to polygamy. Monogamy deeply engrained in american political tradition
-----

Prof cott, likewise, letting ss couples marry does not jeopardize restrictions on incest.
-----

Prof cott, we r multireligious society, separating religious & civil marriage is essential to respecting that religious diversity
-----

Final word from prof cott, letting ss couples marry would be beneficial to marriage.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh wow... gay men have married lesbian women, right?
Thomps on: gay men have married lesbian women, right? Cott: yes. T: So homosexuality per se isn't what marriage laws target, right? C: yes
http://twitter.com/FedcourtJunkie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. New witness - Yale history Prof. Chauncey - describing discrimination in military etc...
http://twitter.com/NCLRights


Yale history Prof. George Chauncey

Lesbians & gay men have experienced widespread and acute discrimination, criminalization, stereotyping and stigmatization.
-----

Chauncey now describing use of disorderly conduct laws to target gay men.
-----

Chauncey describing use of laws that discriminate against gay people to enforce gender stereotypes.
-----

Now describing emplyt discrimination, esp in military.
-----

Lesbians & gay men discharged frm military were humiliated, denied gi benefits, kept them frm getting other jobs.
-----

Chauncey, the military ban more broadly xcluded gays from the nat'l culture.
-----

Chauncey, bc of military ban, country "lost services of patriotic citizens who wanted to serve the country's defense"






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. more testimony...
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 05:28 PM by Kadie
http://twitter.com/NCLRights



Chauncey, reviewing rprt estimating that dadt cost dod abt 95 million to replace discharged & another 95 million to train replacements
-----

Chauncey, 1950 rpt on gay people in civil service, recommnded tightening procedures to identify & discharge gay people from civil service
-----

Eisenhower ex order directed discharge of all gay people frm civil as well as military service.
-----

Eisenhower order in effect till 1975 under carter, not completely lifted till 1990 under clinton.
-----

Eisenhower order required private companies w govt contracts to fire gay workers



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. I really wish they were televising this.
I hope it's being recorded. It's a serious event in American history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. me too...
I have been watching several twitters trying to get a feel for what is going on in that court room.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC