Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Soooooooo...I'm listening to Ed Schultz re: the Halperin expose

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:01 PM
Original message
Soooooooo...I'm listening to Ed Schultz re: the Halperin expose
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 03:07 PM by live love laugh
and Halperin tells Schultz that Palin was so full of misinformation during the campaign that McCain's staffers were alarmed. (Old news)

But, they said, McCain didn't know about any of this. He was totally distanced from any part of the vetting process "because that's the kind of manager he is."

:wtf:

And THAT'S not news that's more important than what Harry Reid said? This man was going to run our country but didn't even particpate in the selecting the person who would be running it in his absence?

Ed Schultz just glossed right over the issue and moved on to attack the next democrat.

All day long people have been calling about the blood on Bush/Cheney's hands vs. the lightweight gossip from this book. Ed keeps shutting them down.

I've been listening to him for a while--he was gung ho Obama for a bit but I'm beginning to wonder about him. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting on all
accounts..thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. That "maverick" is a product of the RNC Chair Rush Limbaugh just as much as
he is Dick Cheney.

Ed? Can't figure him out at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. There is nothing to figure about Ed. He was a RW hack until his wife told him he could do better
being a LW hack. Now he rants about the things he used to support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I didn't know Ed was a former Republicant. That explains why they hairs on my neck
stood up when I first heard him on the air. I've since softened to him a bit--especially because he was so supportive of Obama. But it seems to me that he only fattened Obama up for what will be an inevitable kill later. I don't think his intentions are pure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. His intentions are just as pure as any hack they are to get an audience and money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hilarious
The book is the bible per conservatives relative to democrats, but the stuff about palin they just poo-poo. Must be an awesome job of writing a book, half of which is fact, half of which is fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't know if half is fiction but I do know that the "Librul Media" is certainly selective
in picking out the tidbits regarding democrats while ignoring the rest.

And, if they have some much inside info on the Dems, why isn't there equal inside info on their opponents. Now that might actually be interesting--but then, the other side would probably be in jail if their off-the-record comments were published.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. If it doesn't involve bombing, McFail wants no part of the action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. But Sarah Palin bombed
So, McCain must've had something to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC