Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mountaintop removal mining: EPA says yes, scientists say no

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 11:59 AM
Original message
Mountaintop removal mining: EPA says yes, scientists say no
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=mountaintop-removal-mining-epa-says-2010-01-08

"On the heels of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announcement that it would allow a proposed coal mine involving mountaintop removal to go forward, 12 environmental scientists have published a review of the practice that condemns it in no uncertain terms. "Mining permits are being issued despite the preponderance of scientific evidence that impacts are pervasive and irreversible and that mitigation cannot compensate for losses," the scientists wrote in the January 8 issue of Science. "Regulators should no longer ignore rigorous science."

The group of ecologists, hydrologists and engineers call for a moratorium on the practice as a result of their comprehensive review of the data on its impacts until "new methods can be subjected to rigorous peer review and shown to remedy these problems."

The litany of problems—both to the environment and human health—caused by a practice that involves blasting the top off a mountain to get at the coal beneath it more easily include: heavy metals, sulfuric acid and other mine contaminants in waterways and drinking-water wells; deformed fish carrying toxic levels of selenium found in 73 of 78 streams affected by mountaintop mining; entire streams filled in by blasted mountain rock; and forests cleared to get at the mountaintop beneath them. Add to that the fact that this form of mining has increased exponentially in the past 30 years, supplying roughly 10 percent of U.S. coal, and you have a recipe for much of the environmental devastation visible across northern Appalachia.

The tree planting and other attempted fixes after mining is complete (mitigation efforts initiated by the coal industry) aren't doing the job either: one study found that even 15 years after a mountaintop was leveled, trees had not regrown in the area, possibly because of the poor soils left afterwards. And even the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has testified that they "do not know of a successful stream creation project in conjunction with ."

..."


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As an aside, Ben Sollee and Daniel Martin Moore have made a CD, coming out in mid-February with an aim of shedding light on the mountaintop removal issue. Here is a radio interview with Ben Sollee on the CD and on mountaintop mining: http://www.theweeklyfeed.org/2010/01/12/ben-sollee-interview/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It seems clear that "mitigation efforts" are a failure, and it's time for us to decide as a nation how we want to procure our resources, as well as what resources we want to procure. I advocate moving away from all mountaintop removal mining, and moving toward conservation and more renewable energy sources. As with most issues, it's not black and white, but I think this one comes out fairly clear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. We've absolutely got to move away from this form of mining
And moving towards solar, wind and other renewable, clean energy sources should be a high priority in this country.

The trouble is, that's not going to happen while our government is being run by the two party/same corporate masters system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think we've moved forward, despite that, and we'll have to continue to work despite that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC