10:26 AM: We’re back from a short intermission — so I’m starting a new thread.
Thompson: Quoting a California legislator (Jack O’Connell) who supports domestic partnerships, but has difficulty supporting gay marriage. ”Marriage is too steeped in tradition …” Wasn’t it the opinion of LGBT groups in the 1990’s that supporting civil unions was an “equitable” position?
Chauncey: This was a time when marriage was seen as far too distant a prospect — given the opposition to it. So in this context, they would be grateful to have supported it.
Thompson now wants to show video of people who were beaten up for supporting Prop 8. SF Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart objects, because it is not relevant.
(Opponents of gay marriage love playing the victim. The irony of this is that during the Prop 8 campaign, "Yes on 8" folks tried to organize boycotts of businesses that gave money to "No on 8." See: http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=6222 -- Once the Election was over, nobody talks about this anymore. All we hear about is "Yes on 8" people being boycotted and persecuted for their beliefs, when the EXACT SAME THING happened to our side before the election.)Judge allows Thompson to continue line of questioning on religious groups being “defaced” — but won’t let him show a video.
T: Isn’t it true that some hostility to the LGBT community comes from these attacks on Yes on 8 supporters?
C: It seems unlikely on the face of it. You would have to bring a compelling case to me.
-----
10:33 AM: Thompson — Isn’t it true that people voted for Prop 8 based upon their sincere moral values?
C: Many people opposed desegregation and interracial marriage based upon their sincere moral values.
(NICE!)