|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:44 AM Original message |
Why just DELAY State of Union? Just CANCEL it 'til Obama has guts to VETO BaucusCare,keep his word & |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
1. poutrage du jour? now he's gotta cancel the state of the union? jesus christ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. A new record! "Unrec" Patrol strikes in 4.2 seconds! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:48 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. When it's deserved, why delay?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:49 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. OH TEH COWARDS UNREC MY THREAD!!1!!11 *sob* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Perhaps the cowards are the ones who won't fight for what they claim to believe, & betray those that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. yeah, because demanding he cancel the state of the union makes you somehow noble. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. oooooooooo, you're typing messages on DU is really what fighting is all about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:05 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Your nasty subject line deserves a million unrecs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. People have been politely stating the President meant what he said for 12 months....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
3. Lots of people are interested because they think for themselves. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. Deleted message |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. asking the President to cancel the state of the union until the OP is please is idiocy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. It is the WHITE HOUSE that is said to want to DELAY the speech until signing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
change_notfinetuning (750 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:05 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Details, details. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:14 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. and it's the OP who wants it canceled. details indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
8. I think he should cancel the State of the Union until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. That's a good point....Actually, it seems to be our HC plan that got "Lost"...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TN al (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
18. Isn't there a constitutional requirement to report to congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 11:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. That's a good point...............Article II, Section 3 states.......: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-14-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. In other words, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC