Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Without even counting the slanted polls in Massachusetts, this scares me.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:10 PM
Original message
Without even counting the slanted polls in Massachusetts, this scares me.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/ma/massachusetts_senate_special_election-1144.html

Can we trust MA's liberal leanings to manifest themselves when the GOP and teabaggers are dumping so much money and trying to nationalize the race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are moderate and liberal Ds not at all happy about Coakely
and she has run a lousy campaign. Ds are not outspent but until the last week they have been outcampaigned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. I still can'tbelieve they elected Romney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Romney campaigned as a Social Liberal who would be a better friend to the gays than Kennedy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ah. I knew there had to be some sneakery involved. (Ok, I am pretty sure that's not a word, but
it should be.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. If douchebaggery can be a word, then so can sneakery. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Imagine if Brown were running as a moderate instead of a teabagger.
Coakley wouldn't stand a chance, so far our fortunes have fallen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You're a ray of sunshine today....
Rub it in, there's an unsalted spot on my wounds somewhere...

;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. *hugs* I'm sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. 's okay, just giving you a hard time...
:evilgrin:

There's 4 votes for Coakley coming from my house next Tuesday. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's a good start. :^) I've got my fingers crossed that things go right. Say, Maine
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 09:22 PM by GreenPartyVoter
used to be part of Mass. Can I come vote too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. If things go 'right', health reform is dead. :( nt
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 09:27 PM by LLStarks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Butt out n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't see much of a problem here
Only 3 of the 10 polls are calling for Brown.

And the GOP is running out of money. They're going to have to pick their battles more carefully.

As for the Teabaggers - what's THEIR warchest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. It all depends on getting out the Dem voters. If they vote, she'll win,
if the motivated Pubs outnumber them, she'll loose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC