Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Ike Skelton opposes DADT repeal, says it would 'create disruption' and cause 'serious problems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:21 AM
Original message
Rep. Ike Skelton opposes DADT repeal, says it would 'create disruption' and cause 'serious problems
The leading House Democrat on military policy said Friday that he opposes repealing the law that bans openly gay people from serving in the military.

Seventeen years ago, Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) played a major role in crafting the controversial law known as "Don't ask, don't tell." When President Bill Clinton wanted to lift the ban preventing gay people from joining the military, Skelton opposed the move. The end result was a compromise under which gay service members would conceal their sexual orientation.

Now, after President Barack Obama pledged during his campaign and first year in office to repeal the law, Skelton finds himself on the opposite side once again.

"I am personally not for changing the law," he said during a C-SPAN "Newsmakers" interview that will air Sunday.

Because the military is engaged in two major conflicts, in Afghanistan and Iraq, changing the law would create "disruption" that can cause some "serious problems," Skelton said during the interview.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/76427-skelton-opposes-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. What an idiot.
DADT has hurt the military and this country by forcing qualified men and women out for an incredibly stupid excuse.

Mr. Skelton needs to take his head out of his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Showing his complete ignorance of day to day life in the military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. No it wouldn't
I've known people that served along side me that were gay, and honestly I never knew for a long time.

Some of my more conservative coworkers in the military constantly say "what happens if they start touching me" or "what happens if they try to sexually assault me"...

Well, dumbass, then it would fall under sexual harassment and sexual assault, just like it would for heterosexuals. The problem is, they don't realize that gay people have been serving in the military for many, many years, and as far as I know, there haven't been many same-sex assaults of a sexual nature.

I had met and served in Qatar with the Air Force Lt Colonel that got "outed" and then kicked out...I never knew he was gay until he appeared on the Rachel Maddow show. It's a shame that happened to him, he was a fighter dude, and most of those guys are assholes (well, towards non-fighter pilots). But he was actually one of the good fighter guys, got along with everyone, and we raised many a beer back then. He should have been allowed to finish out his 20 years and retire with dignity...after all, he gave this country 18 years of fine service.

People can blame the military all they want, but in the end, most of the rank-and-file in the military would be fine. A few would be up in arms, but ultimately they would have to support the change in the law or get out. Nothing will happen though until both the executive branch and the Congress take action. They alone have the authority to change the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. I worked with gay men and women in the Navy. IT NEVER MATTERED.
What DID matter was this: "Are you capable of carrying this toolbox and aircraft part out to the flightline? Once there, can you get them both up onto the wing of the a/c so that if you need to, you can work on top of the fuselage or wing?"

"Yes? Well then here you go... check out a toolbox, go out to a/c 511, and change the port side inboard flap screwjack. Come get me when you're done so we can test it, sign off on it, and get the bird PMCF'd (Post Maintenance Check Flight) and back to 100% Mission Capability."

Granted, when I was deployed at sea in the 80's, there WERE no women on Aircraft Carriers... if there were, they'd have been put to the same test. Other than that, nothing else would have mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC