Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Haitian situation is exactly why we need general-aviation airports here at home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 02:53 AM
Original message
The Haitian situation is exactly why we need general-aviation airports here at home
If you'll recall, a few months ago there was a short but fairly intense debate over government money being spent on smaller municipal airports, also called general-aviation airport and, mistakenly, "private airports".

These are airports that do not serve as airline hubs, and are used largely by private pilots, charter aircraft, cropdusters, and flight-training schools.


Well, the situation is Haiti is EXACTLY why such a large network of smaller airfields is critical to our safety in emergency situations.

Port-au-Prince has, if you've been watching Rachel, only a single runway with apron space for perhaps a dozen jets, and access is by a single road. All the relief for some 3 million people is dependant on that single runway and that access road.


Can such an event happen here? Of course it can. And it has. And it will. And our network of smaller, diverse, general-aviation airports will be instrumental in flying in rescuers and flying out refugees and casualties.


My town has an airport, a small, quiet one. But it is paved and illuminated, and long enough and wide enough for both C-130 and C-17 cargo aircraft to operate from. If there was a major crisis around in the area north of the Twin Cities, my town would be one of several where relief effort logistics could flow through.


I don't anticipate that, thank FSM... I'm not in an earthquake or hurricane zone. But it's there in case it is needed.

The same is true all across the country. If Port-au-Prince had a dozen or so smaller airports scattered around its metro area, aid would be getting in and getting around significantly faster than it is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree 100%! Recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought that in cases of emergency the interstates were to be used as emergency air strips
Edited on Sat Jan-16-10 03:39 AM by JVS
If you drive along I-80 in Indiana, you'll notice a lot of buildings that look like conning towers along the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Depends on the interstate, I guess
Some parts have too much median or too many bridges. Besides, if the interstate is being used for a runway, it can't be used for truck traffic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I thought this too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. There's The Problems Of Ground Transportation
You are correct...the airstrip in Port-Au-Prince is smaller than the municipal and private airports in my area. It definitely is not equipped to handle the volume of traffic needed to bring supplies to all those in need. There are other strips around the country, but the destruction of roads and breakdown of civil authority seems to be adding to the problem.

The best airstrips are in the Dominican Republic and I'm glad to see how that country has taken a lead in the relief efforts and should be a big conduit once lines of communications and roads are restored.

One doesn't need airports when there are few tourists...the problem you site is systemic in many underdeveloped countries where air travel is for the privilidged. As we're seeing, Haiti has little infrastructure and what little there was collapsed in seconds after the ground began to shake. Even if supplies are getting into the country, it's another thing to get them down substandard roads littered with collapsed houses and dead bodies.

If there's a lesson in this tragedy, it's to look at our own earthquake prone regions and how prepared they are in the event of a similar disaster. How would our civil authorities handle such a catastrophe. It's not a matter of if this will happen, but when.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Especially on the West Coast and the Gulf Coast
Earthquakes and hurricanes, oh my!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. One Can't Help But Wonder...
I not only think about Katrina, but the various hurricanes that bore down on Texas that year. One led to the evacuation of Houston that turned into a fiasco as traffic snarled on the Interstates and, sadly, led to several people dying in some nasty crashes. And, with NOLA, even with several days warning, many didn't or couldn't get out of harm's way. While our infrastructure is a lot more developed than Haiti, such a disaster in this country...one that devestates a major city, would tax services and communications beyond what it may be able to deliver. Again...here's hoping this is a wake-up call for areas prone to natural disasters to look at their own plans and learn from what happens when social structures totally break down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think with NOLA, the issue was that nobody was screaming
"THE LEVEES ARE GOING TO BREAK!!! GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!"

Although somebody should have been!


Because the city survived the hurricane itself without much difficulty. And if the levees hadn't broken, then the situation would have turned into a couple-3 days without electricity while the citizens heated canned food over a barbeque and drank warm soda until the utilities were restored and the streets were cleared.



Of course, NOLA is not on a island and it's part of the US, so establishing authority and being close to supplies helped. Not that Bush incompetence didn't fight those advantages as best they could...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Nagin Screamed Too Late...
Even then, there were many who had no place to go. Get on a bus to where? Even after Katrina there were areas that weren't willing to take the refugees. Those who didn't have cars or family elsewhere were stuck...especially the poorest who were hesitant to walk away from all they had...leaving their homes open to looting. When I was in NOLA in '08 I asked several people who stayed why they did...most answered this was their home and they had nowhere else to go. Yes, many didn't heed the warnings, but many believed the levees would protect them until all of a sudden their homes were underwater...in many cases the water rose in a matter of an hour. I-10 began a river...impossible to use for any escape or the distribution of relief.

It's easy to conjecture...and many have...as to how different things may have been had there been a better evacuation plan, but even when the evacuation order was given and there was still time to get out, many decided to take their chances...and to be honest, if I were in their position, I may have done the same thing.

While mahy like to think of Katrina as a natural disaster...just like Haiti, the complications are all man-made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R. Very well stated...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. I remember that debate well
For the record Haiti has five airports. I'm trying to find out the extent of damage over at Cap Haitien which is also a paved international airport. I'm pretty sure Jacmel was destroyed - they were devastated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm thinking about Phoenix now--we have five airports (which gresw out of cropdusting
facilities) besides Sky Harbor International. It's quite clear how well served we would be in a situation like that.

I really appreciate all the information from people who know what's involved in this effort in terms of logistics and planning. It really offers some great perspective on what a truly monumental task this is.

GREAT read, thanks. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC