Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you support plans to reintegrate members of the Taliban into Afghan society?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 12:55 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do you support plans to reintegrate members of the Taliban into Afghan society?
http://www.khaleejtimes.ae/DisplayArticle08.asp?xfile=data/international/2010/January/international_January899.xml§ion=international

US supports Afghan plan to reintegrate Taliban (AP)

17 January 2010, KABUL - The U.S. supports a proposal to lure fighters with no strong allegiance to terrorists away from the insurgency and reintegrate them into Afghan society, the American special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan said Sunday.

Richard Holbrooke said he talked with Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Sunday about a plan the government is crafting to offer jobs, vocational training and other economic incentives to tens of thousands of Taliban foot soldiers willing to switch sides after eight years of war.

“We completely support the program as it develops,” Holbrooke said. “The majority of the people fighting with the Taliban are not supporters of (Taliban leader) Mullah Omar. They’re not supporters of the ideology of al-Qaida. They don’t even know who al-Qaida is and yet they fight because they’ve been misled by false information.”

Holbrooke, who had a heated meeting last year with Karzai over the fraud-stained Afghan presidential election, spoke at town hall-style event in the Afghan capital of Kabul where about 40 academics, videographers, representatives from non-governmental organizations, radio broadcasters and others were invited to ask Holbrooke questions. Their inquiries ranged from questions about reintegration and corruption to U.S. economic assistance and the Pakistani intelligence service’s involvement in violence in the region — a question Holbrooke declined to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why would someone say no, if by 'reintegrate' you mean rehabilitate as peaceful citizens
Edited on Sun Jan-17-10 12:59 PM by closeupready
of a state recognized by the UN and which is a peaceful member of the world? The Allies successfully reintegrated former Nazis into post-war Germany, and they could do it with the Taliban, I have no doubt.

If instead you mean Mullah Omar or any of the others who collaborated significantly with the 9/11 plotters, then obviously, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, if successful there is a good chance the US will be able to achieve it's goals
of a stable Afghanistan and then our troops can come home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. They already are part of Afghan society.
Even if Holbrooke says they're ignorant, easily misled, and don't understand that when we kill them and their fellow citizens it's for their own good.

Holbrooke reads too much Kipling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Ding ding ding...
"They already are part of Afghan society. "

yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. I maintain it doesn't really matter
...The notion is simply meant to drive more wedges between Karzai and the locals.

Obama's been doing business around Karzai instead of through him. Karzai responds by increasing his anti-West rhetoric. We respond by appealing to the Taliban.

It's something of a side show, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Everyone who said "no", failed to learn the lessons of the US civil war. n/t
Edited on Sun Jan-17-10 01:14 PM by lumberjack_jeff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes of course. Peace requires negotiations and concessions. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. The sort of religious "believers".......
who've been sucked into the Taliban are not to be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. what about the ones in our Air Force?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They're also not to be trusted! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. In 1865, there were probably similar worries
Unless all the "enemy" is killed, there has to be a reintegration after conflict
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC