We've already heard about how Republican Senate Candidate Scott Brown doesn't think much of rape victims. Now Think Progress reports that Brown, who is gunning to take over the late Ted Kennedy's key seat, really has it in for first responders who worked in the aftermath of 9/11.
In October 2001, Brown voted against a measure to provide financial aid to 9/11 Red Cross emergency responders. Those are the folks who made headlines for rushing into the billowing smoke and chaos of Ground Zero. In the following months, many were stricken with massive health problems that have been linked to toxic exposures at the site. Of course, it wasn't the first time these workers got the shaft from the political establishment. Their story was featured in Michael Moore's Sicko, which depicts their ongoing struggle to receive adequate medical care for their crippling illnesses.(They're now pushing for more federal relief through a pending bill.)
So in light of the continued suffering of these courageous aid workers eight years on--a stark testament to the cruelty of the twin health care and economic crises--does Brown have any misgivings about his earlier opposition to providing them with basic financial help? In a word: nah.
TP: In 2001, you voted against 9/11 recovery workers, giving them aid, do you have any comment on this story?
BROWN: Yes, it was a time when our budget was down. We had a lot of cuts unfortunately, and we had to take care of our own priorities first.
http://www.aunation.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=63941