Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think the HC bill would have been better had we 59 actual Dems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:37 PM
Original message
Do you think the HC bill would have been better had we 59 actual Dems
not fifty eight and two Indies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reconciliation is the key to a better bill.
You only need 51.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Reconciliation can't pass most of the bill's items. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Health insurance abuse won't be fixed by Laws or regulations
They are fixed by dumping them for a public option. You can't legislate morality or good behavior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. People who spout the reconciliation line
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 04:43 PM by WeDidIt
have no clue how reconciliation works.

For example, claim denial due to pre-exisitng conditions cannot be banned via reconciliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. No preexisting conditions clause for Medicare.
Support for a public option is huge. It's now or never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, it would have been better with a strong public option and no mandate. Or Medicare for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. here is David Sirota's take on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. "the magic 60" is a cop-out
they dont want to help the people. I take that back, the only people they want to help are the ones that give millions and billions to their election campaigns, throw fundraisers and employ them as lobbyists whenever we get around to throwing them out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I do not think it was or is a cop out.
The bill was going to be bad any way you sliced it but I think the Medicare buy in (which is better than a public option in my opinion but should have been expanded to include EVERYONE who wants to buy in) would have been left in if they did not have to suck up to Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. We don't have 58 actual Dems now, IMO. Nelson, Bayh,
Landrieu, Baucus etc are not reliable Democratic votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BP2 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Two or three other wishy-washy Moderates in the Senate will bail, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yep, there are enough DINOs to screw up any bill. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. One of the "indies" is Bernie Sanders
we'd be way better off in so many ways if we had 59 Democrats like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. +1000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. Oh yes, I know that with the 60th being Bernie we could have gotten a lot more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. It doesn't make sense that the 58 would let it be turned into such a bunch of shit.
And it would probably help if the president hadn't gone all in blind before a final form was found. His determination to sign a bill is detrimental to the cause of holding out for a good bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. It would have been better if we had even TEN real Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. If we had 59 actual Dem, read real Democrats, then
some form of Single Payer,Universal Health Care would have been on the table form the beginning.
We might be holding War Crimes Trials in this country also. But what do I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. No I think it would be better if we had 5-10 worth while Rethugs
But they wouldn't be modern rethugs if they were interested at all in actual legislating. I can't understand why any Independent voter in Mass would think the Senate would be better with even more dead weight. I expect a small fraction of dead weight in any party. But the whole Republican party is legislative dead weight. Basically leaving a 60 seat senate that needs 100 percent participation to work. How it's the Dems fault I never get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. One of the Indies I'll claim
The other one should have been left twisting in the wind when he ran against the Democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yes,
if only because peoples' expectations would not have been as high!

We never had anywhere close to 60 REAL Democrats, despite what they call themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Where are you getting THOSE numbers.. realistically we maybe have 45 on a good day..
when you subtract out the blue dog DLC'er types: Evan Bayh of Indiana, Tom Carper of Delaware and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, Michael Bennet of Colorado, Mark Begich of Alaska, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Bill Nelson of Florida, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Mark Udall of Colorado, and Mark Warner of Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC