|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:17 PM Original message |
What Would Teddy Want? Martha Coakley to lose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Teddy Kennedy would have put PRINCIPLE above PARTY and would have been for SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yeah. Because he was such a wide-eyed idealist and refused to make any compromises. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Actually, I think Teddy would have voted for the bill as it stands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. If Teddy were still with us, this bill would have never reached this level of absoulute suckage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-19-10 07:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I don't think so. Kennedy recognized the wisdom of half a loaf being better than none...even a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-19-10 08:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Ted Kennedy led the initial work on the HELP bill that never was SP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. Teddy would be aghast at the thought of his seat going to the GOP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-19-10 07:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Rove, Limbaugh, and Beck would love to have Kennedy's hide as a trophy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. Teddy would have been aghast at this bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. IT'S NO GOING TO HAPPEN IF COAKLEY LOSES! THE BILL HASN'T PASSED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Learning Nomad (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I wish that I lived in your world. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Learning Nomad (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Erroneous post, please ignore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Learning Nomad (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. A couple of people have access to this account. SRY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-19-10 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
14. Unrec for use of the word pout. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-19-10 08:33 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I call 'em like I sees 'em. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-19-10 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
17. No, he would have posted flamebait on DU attacking anyone who disagreed with him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC