Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brad Friedman on the Malloy show now - addressing Diebolding of Massachusettes election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:14 PM
Original message
Brad Friedman on the Malloy show now - addressing Diebolding of Massachusettes election
Listen up. This is why the polls have been favoring the naked teabagging dipshit. It's already in the bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Take off the tin foil.. if we lose in MA it will be our own fault for not putting up a real Dem cand
idate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Keep drinking the kool aid!
Coakley is a "real" Democratic candidate, who, unlike her opponent, has already won statewide office in MA by a wide margin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yawn ... you're the one on the Kool Aid pal..
they are voting against the DLC and corporatist health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. By electing a candidate who is even more corporatist,
when Coakley herself is a liberal, not even a moderate or 'blue dog'?

Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. nope she's a Rahm Emanuel special.. actually it means corporatist health care giveaway gets killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Have you looked at her record at all,
or are you just parroting what your media heroes tell you to think?

If this bill is so bad, why did EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT in the Senate vote for it? Or is every one of them a "Rahm Emanuel special" too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What's worse?
A tin foil hat, or blinders?

Just wondering... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. looks like you're wearing both so why choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It only looks that way because you haven't taken off your blinders...
Meanwhile, I really don't value what you think you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. lame trash talk.. you lose..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Hey, whatever makes you feel right...
Meanwhile, you might want to empty that "trash" yourself on the way to looking into black box voting and examining the history of election fraud. Yeah, real tin foil hat stuff...

You're such a winner!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I agree that Coakley is a weak, insurance corporate loving, RomneyCare shilling candidate
But that doesn't mean electro-fraud still won't happen. Actually it increases the probability of fraud, because the only thing that prevents fraud is high turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tell 'em Brad.
He is a DU veteran who knows what's happening with the computers counting our votes: they steal them.

The more people who raise cain about their votes, the less they can steal.
That is what you can do: raise cain!!

The vote you save may be your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. So we have Diebold employees here now?
Unrecs for a thread warning about the VERY REAL chance of another stolen election?

Really?

Which one of you chickenshit cowards will admit to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I unrecc'd it. The OP stated in no uncertain terms that the election was already "IN THE BAG".
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 10:56 PM by cherokeeprogressive
It's not. Coakley will win. I'm sure though, that we won't see the OP here tomorrow night saying "Okay, I was wrong".

There is a "very real chance" that an object formed over 13 billion years ago somewhere else in the newly born universe could crash smack dab into your house next Thursday. It's not likely, but the "chance" exists.

Saying the election is "in the bag" is nothing more than alarmist bullshit in my opinion, so I unrecc'd this post.

Lastly, I'm not a chickenshit coward. But thanks for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Have you read Brad Friedman's article, or anything regarding election fraud at BradBlog.com?
I suggest you do some reading before you dismiss any possibility of such treacherous shit occurring.

www.bradblog.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yeah, we'll see if you're standing on the rooftop crowing about Diebold after Coakley wins.
Talk to me then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. If she wins, it will be because the turnout was high enough to beat the fraud.
Much like the 2008 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. BradBlog is fixate on a myth. Voters who don't read and follow directions spoil ballots. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElmoBlatz Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Democrats own the Government in Mass
EVERY part of it. If we manage to have this stolen from us, we deserve our fate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Which is why there were two Repuke governors in recent history.
The last one being a carpetbagging dog abusing holy underwear wearing corporate raiding freak wackjob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC