Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Enough with the henhouse bitchiness over Martha Coakley's campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 04:57 PM
Original message
Enough with the henhouse bitchiness over Martha Coakley's campaign
That goes for people on both sides of this argument.

Yes, Martha Coakley ran a lackluster campaign compared to Scott Brown's. Yes, she made a baseball gaffe. If that bugs you so much, just remember that she'll only be in the Senate for two years finishing out what should have been Ted Kennedy's term, and if she still isn't to your liking in 2012, you can replace her with whomever you like. If memory serves me right, Coakley had to defeat other Democrats in a primary not too long ago just to run against Brown to begin with.

As for those clucking their tongues and labelling anyone who would dare criticize Coakley as a teabagger or a Naderite, we know exactly what sort of game you're playing, and it got old a long time ago. Honest dissent is still the highest form of patriotism, so instead of bitching at Coakley's critics, get out and vote, phonebank, or whatever you can do in support of Coakley. Self-righteous bashing of progressive Democrats won't endear you to anyone here.

Martha Coakley is our contestant in the Massachusetts Special Election for US Senate. Vote her into office, shut down Brown, and let's move on to the next chapter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. "henhous bitchiness." Oy.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ever been in a henhouse?
It's not sexism, if that's what you're thinking - it's just a reference to the ambient noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Hey, I'm just an innocent bystander. Buttered popcorn is mmmmm, mmmm good!
'specially when you can wash it down with a refreshing :beer:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think we'll all need one of those tonight
Regardless of who wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. sorry, its historical use is indeed one of sexism.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 05:37 PM by cali
your saying that it's all about the noise in a hen house doesn't change that it's sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Erm, Henhouse, referring to female chickens. Bitchiness, from the name for a female dog
and implies women's meritless anger.

Care to reframe that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'Henhouse bitchiness?'
'Clucking?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Come on, now! I have hens.
They never bitch and squabble as bad as people here do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. ...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacksondem Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. But But But
It was a really big baseball gaffe.... and the comment about not wanting to be out in the cold shaking hands did not help either....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Only two years?
Guess that's how long we'll have to hold our noses if Brownshorts gets in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElmoBlatz Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can we wait and see who wins first?
Not a single vote has been counted yet. Chill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. My point exactly (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Can you be more sexist? I think not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Honest dissent is still the highest form of patriotism" -- YES! k&r
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Objectionable for two reasons: henhouse and bitchiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm not politically correct - this has never been a secret
If I spend all my time trying to find the most neutral and unoffensive language possible, I'll never get any work done.

I yam what I yam, and that's all that I yam...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Both terms are pejoratives unflattering to females.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. See #3 (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. See #20.
You can't even claim ignorance any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. That's a lot of effort to become offended. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JetCityLiberal Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. You lost me at 'henhouse bitchiness'
I know you don't care.

The sexism here is more than old.

Paul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. WHAT sexism?
Lighten up, already. It's DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JetCityLiberal Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. It is sexist.
I will never 'lighten up' about sexism, racism, homophobic bigotry in any form even on forums like DU.

Have a nice day derby.

Paul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. You too, Paul...
...but try to remember that a hologram looks a little bit different to every observer.

And what I did was not sexist.

And this debate only detracts from the fact that Martha Coakley needs to win tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JetCityLiberal Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Go Martha!
I agree with you on that one!

Paul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. You lecture about name calling while such insulting terms in your wording???
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 05:33 PM by nini
:rofl:


Misogynistic much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Again, what misogyny?
If I was really being sexist, my wife would have something to say about that - she's a good lifelong liberal Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. GODDAMMIT! What good would DU be if we didn't fucking squabble and hyperbolize
endlessly over things!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
30. Look, the bitch belongs in jail.
If I were a Mass. resident I would still vote for her, for national reasons, but the simple fact is that we got what we deserved. In the arrogance of thinking we couldn't lose, we nominated a woman who is insider scum, who belongs in jail.. for the Amirault case among others.

The clear lesson is don't get arrogant.. nominate good candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC