MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 55.92% SCOTT P. BROWN 42.87%

[happy_liberal]

Number of Precincts 254
Precincts Reporting 23 9.1 %
Total Votes 11714
Number of Uncast Votes 1
MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 6550 55.92%
SCOTT P. BROWN REP 5022 42.87%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY LIB 126 1.08%
Write-in Votes 16 0.14%

http://www.cityofboston.gov/elections/currentelections/

[FLAprogressive]

1. well that's kind of dishonest....those are returns from Boston only....

[regnaD kciN]

8. And she should be doing MUCH better in Boston than that...

However, we don't know which precincts there are reporting. Boston has its (small) hotbeds of conservatism, too.

[happy_liberal]

36. It is 66 32 now

n/t

[NYC Liberal]

2. Title is misleading, this is only for Boston...but great news for that area

anyway!

[usregimechange]

42. Um, no it is not, needs to be 70% or more for her to have a small chance in hell

[NYC Liberal]

43. It's already over, but she did get 70% in Boston. nt

[Connie_Corleone]

3. You need to edit your post to state that this is for Boston ONLY.

[BrklynLiberal]

4. That is for Boston only..right?

Enough to counter the opposite results in the suburbs?

[ddeclue]

5. It's not the Senator from BOSTON it's the Senator from Massachusetts.

[AllieB]

11. But cities like Boston have the largest number of registered voters.

And if Mayor Menino activated his voter turn-out machine, Martha will be in good shape.

[ddeclue]

17. Not BUTS.. it's misleading..

[zanana1]

37. It's the senator from PART of Massachusetts. nt

[Mojambo]

6. If she's only getting 55% in Boston she's DONE. n/t

[WI_DEM]

10. exactly.

[virgogal]

7. No surprise there!

[marmar]

9. If those are the Boston-only numbers, that doesn't look good.....

I think she'll have to carry the Hub by a lot more than that margin.

[NYC Liberal]

12. 59.35-39.47 now!

MARTHA COAKLEY..............DEM..............11938..............59.35%
SCOTT P. BROWN..............REP...............7940..............39.47%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY...........LIB................204...............1.01%
Write-in Votes..................................33...............0.16%

[happy_liberal]

13. okey sorry

everyone is posting that Brown is winning based on the small precincts... isn't Boston a pretty populated area of Mass?

[Electric Monk]

14. 52% Brown 47% Coakley with 36% reporting for MASSACHUSETTS, which is what matters

http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/senate/results.html

[Statistical]

15. UTTERLY OFF THE CHARTS HORRIBLE.

Coakley should be 20-25pts ahead in Boston.

Brown will sweep rural areas so in Coakley only built up a 12pt lead in the largest urban center in the state it is done.

Nice misleading headline though OP. Got me excited for a second or two.

[NYC Liberal]

26. She's up by 28 points now.

MARTHA COAKLEY..............DEM..............38545.........63.16%
SCOTT P. BROWN..............REP..............21813.........35.74%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY...........LIB................586..........0.96%
Write-in Votes..................................80..........0.13%

[Bluebear]

16. What make you "happy", getting people's hopes up?

[happy_liberal]

18. seems like Duers want her to lose

everyone is reporting what the media is saying- well what to do you expect from them?

Why don't we wait until the most populated areas come in before giving up all hope?

[Bluebear]

21. Seems like you're a real piece of work.

[happy_liberal]

24. uh thanks...

for giving me the opportunity to use this

[Bluebear]

28. Nice. You're making a real splash.

[zanana1]

32. I agree that you're being pessimistic...

And you seem to be enjoying it.

[Bluebear]

35. Thank you newbie, for peering into my mind

[zanana1]

40. I've been here since 2004.

I had to re-register because of a glitch, oh wise one. Are you going to drink some champagne now that you've been proven right?

[Bluebear]

41. really, whoever you are, go away. /ignore

[tbyg52]

19. FIX YOUR SUBJECT!

(Sorry, I don't usually shout.)

[Make7]

29. +1

[cry baby]

20. Boston numbers are important, but it may not be enough. Thanks for trying to keep our spirits up!

[happy_liberal]

25. thanks for understanding

I don't think we should give up at least until Boston's numbers are in...

[Terra Alta]

22. don't get my hopes up

like that... please amend your title to say these results are BOSTON only...

[Jennicut]

23. It is looking better for Coakley in Boston now.

MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 30039 60.58%
SCOTT P. BROWN REP 18993 38.31%


SENATOR IN CONGRESS
Total
Number of Precincts 254
Precincts Reporting 88 34.6 %
Total Votes 49582
Number of Uncast Votes 5
MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 30039 60.58%
SCOTT P. BROWN REP 18993 38.31%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY LIB 480 0.97%
Write-in Votes 70 0.14%

[Make7]

27. 64% to 35% now. ( n/t )

[happy_liberal]

30. excellent!

:applause:

[apocalypsehow]

31. This is the textbook definition of disruption.

:thumbsdown:

[happy_liberal]

33. What is the population of Boston?

I see people losing hope because we are down 3,000 in a small conservative precinct.

[bigwillq]

34. About 600,000(nt)

[happy_liberal]

38. 67 31

nt

[happy_liberal]

39. 68 30