So if Brown wins with 52%, I think we should be allowed to pass HCR with 52+1 Senators
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:03 PM
Original message |
So if Brown wins with 52%, I think we should be allowed to pass HCR with 52+1 Senators |
|
Fair is fair, no?
Or does Democracy only count for elections and Republican Senate votes?
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We've always been allowed to pass HCR with 52 Senators |
|
This 60 vote claim is a bullshit excuse.
|
benlurkin
(179 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We don't want to set that precedent for the Pukes when they have the majority. Bad strategy.
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Republicans passed their crap laws with only 50 votes. |
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. I usually don't pick on newbies, but are you insane? |
|
51 votes IS the "precedent".
Republicans used it when they had the majority. For some inexplicable reason, Dems refuse to.
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. The reason isn't inexplicable.. |
|
The Republicans block EVERYTHING. Short of changing the rules (which we can't do either for the same reason) there's nothing we can do about it.
The Senate is very broken.
|
benlurkin
(179 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. Using Reconciliation in a Puke filibuster |
|
for budget items not legislative. Think of the implications and the shit they can pass if they gain majority.
You are sweet but I'm a big girl and love the discussion. I don't feel picked on. Really.
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. How many times did the Repubs pass legislation without a Dem filibuster? |
|
The whole "filibuster" argument is just stuff. It's a threat that we ALLOW to be hung over our heads. It's a boogeyman.
...and I respect that you hold your ground.
|
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. What good did the filibuster do us anyway when we were in the minority? |
|
It's a good strategy because getting it passed will help us in coming elections.
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I wasn't aware that we needed more than 51. |
Ozymanithrax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
4. You must refer ot the Senate rules. |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:10 PM by Ozymanithrax
As long as any legislation needs 60 votes, that legislation will be raped with a curling iron.
|
benlurkin
(179 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
jpak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message |
8. No, we should Kill the Bill |
|
it's cool to kill the bill
yup
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I need affordable health care and so do millions of others who are even poorer than me.
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Thanks for the unrecs teabaggers. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.