That's it - Brown's 2012 Dem challenger must be pro-gun, pro-PO, pro-jobs, pro-choice, and HUNGRY.

[derby378]

Scott Brown's Democratic challenger must be so focused on winning that Senate seat that he or she acts like a junkyard dog chewing on a hunk of raw meat. No vacations in the Carribean, no misspelling "Massachusetts," no half-assed campaign tour. The candidate must focus on the Senate seat like a laser and pursue it like a bloodhound chasing an escaped convict.

Hunger. Drive. Ambition. These are not necessarily bad things in a candidate, provided he or she have the people's best interests at heart.

Martha Coakley learned this lesson just a little too late.

(Reposted from earlier - apparently there was a glitch.)

[marmar]

1. Would pro-gun be that important in Massachussets? I mean really?

nt

[derby378]

2. Given the circumstances, it just might

I'm not saying the candidate should get all mushy about the NRA - I think most MA voters would have none of that.