Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did the haters and the hecklers win?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:38 PM
Original message
Why did the haters and the hecklers win?
How could Massachusetts lower itself to voting for the candidate of ugliness?

And how can we ever recover from this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. by choosing candidates who will actually, you know, CAMPAIGN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There ya go. Maybe they should be able to spell their states, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. LOL. I don't think the voters can be totally blamed if they thought Coakley didn't care about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. But goddamnit, they KNEW no Republican ever did.
And they all knew Brown had no redeeming features.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is going to be tough on the people of Mass,
Friendships will be lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Massachusetts pissed on Teddy's grave tonight.
Nobody who voted for Brown has any right to say he or she ever supported what Teddy was about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. What does Ted Kennedy have to do with any of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It was his seat...Less than six months after he died fighting for the people of Mass
They voted for someone who hates everything Teddy stood for. There was no excuse for that. With those votes, they said that nothing Teddy did ever meant anything to them. Nobody who voted for Brown has any right to have a picture of any Kennedy up in their home after tonight. They've said that they just want ugliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't even know how to respond to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It's hard to believe Massachusetts won't just go all the way hard right now
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:59 PM by Ken Burch
Why should anyone think this is just a one-off?

I'd like to think somebody there will fight back...but why should I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Do you know New England at all? We always do this. Lots of Dems with one prominent Rethug.
Hell, in CT we have had a Dem legislature for years and we have a moderate Rethug Gov. Twice we elected two different moderate Rethugs. Mass had Rethug govs 4 times in row. Now they have Patrick, a Dem, for Gov.
Mass is not moving right. People are worried about the economy and confused and upset over what the Dems offered on health care. Too much deliberation and not enough clear cut action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Already done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Simple: Passion and Intensity always win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Slight amendment: Corporate funded passion and intensity always win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Coakley's hubris. That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because "it's only been a year" might work on DU but not in MA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. There's your absurd assumption..
... there aren't enough haters and hecklers in MA to do this.

It was people who are tired of watching bankers pay themselves multi million dollar bonuses while they struggle to survive.

It is people who are outraged that the architects of this economic disaster are being REWARDED because they are "too big to fail" while the rest of America struggles.

You are SOOOOOOOO out of touch with what people are feeling right now if you think this election came down to a handful of miscreants. Your marginalization is similar to that the DLC issues about the left, and just as full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. If they wanted to vote against the bankers, why vote for the party OF the bankers?
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 10:06 PM by Ken Burch
They voted for the guy who's side of the aisle would give the bankers even MORE, and then wouldn't ask for any of it back.

Your post would be valid if, say, a Green or socialist candidate had taken 20%...but nobody could've thought voting for Brown would stick it to the bankers, for fcuk's sake.

And in a DECENT state, the "curling iron" outburst would have DESTROYED Brown's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. News flash..
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 10:15 PM by sendero
... as of last november, the Dems ARE the party of the bankers. Get a fucking clue already. We bailed out GS because GS has infected our government.

People voted last Nov to END THAT, and WE DIDN'T, NOT AT ALL. That is the entire problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Wow, so they vote Republican? Yeah, that makes sense!
idiots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe we should tea bag repugs and clamor for more intelligence from them,
Or just fucking go nuts as that seems to mobilize people who have pent up shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. I've been watching from the beginning.
I'm going to tell you that this decision has simply confirmed my opinion that a majority of Americans vote for pretty, without a clue what's behind the face, or that they're ignorant enough that their voter registration card should be taken away.

This man voted for health care in his own state, but will vote against health care reform for the country. There has to be a better way to deal with the excess population than having 43,000 poor people die unnecessarily every year.

Fiscal conservatives will destroy what Matthews calls 'entitlement' programmes, i.e., anything that keeps people from starving on the streets.

He voted against aid to 9/11 recovery workers because it was too expensive; didn't seem to hamper his efforts to build a golf course in his area, however.

He tried to deny emergency contraception to rape victims. In 2005, Brown sponsored a legislative amendment that would have allowed medical personnel to deny emergency contraception to rape victims if it "conflicts with a sincerely held religious belief." The amendment didn’t pass, but Brown owned it. It was attached to a bill that he ultimately voted for, which required emergency rooms to provide contraceptives to rape victims.

He made the claim that Obama was born out of wedlock. That was on Rachel Maddow last night.

He has joined with the tea party bunch, appeared at their rallies......and then tried to deny any affiliation with them.

He wants a constitutional ban on gay marriage. He has said that two women raising a child is 'not normal.' He should get out a bit more.

He opposes a fee to get bailout money back from big banks.

Oh, yeah, he's posed nude for playgirl.....at least his mouth was shut during that episode, and they didn't give us a picture of the calesthenics involved in putting his foot in his mouth, although that might have been interesting.


What in the name of all that is holy or unholy posessed the people of mass. to vote this idiot in? I don't like Coakley's attitude, so I'll show her and vote for this twerp?

What in hell is in the water down there?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC