I think the next Dem Leader in the Senate needs to be from a SOLIDLY BLUE STATE.

[LaydeeBug]

that way we'll see less capitulation to try and stay afloat in a red state. In short, Dean is right and Emmanuel is wrong

[midnight]

1. Dean is so wise.

[LaydeeBug]

4. maybe a bit less corrupted? Rahm seems to have gotten a LOT wrong here, unless he meant to be

ineffective to "appear" to want reform with a dirty wink to the insurance companies. But that scenario is even worse.

[smalll]

2. Yeah! Like from Massachusetts!

Oh, wait...

[LaydeeBug]

7. LOL!! TK would have been reelected in Mass...

I just mean a solid dem. Feingold would be awesome, but what about Mikulski? The only thing that will decide when she leaves office will be HER.

[Union Yes]

3. Russ Feingold. knr nt

[ProudToBeBlueInRhody]

5. PLUS, it won't be likely they get voted out and embarass the party

Like what will happen to Harry.

[ibegurpard]

6. I disagree

The next leader needs to be a voice that will make the average person think he is fighting for THEM.
And not just make them THINK it but PROVE it to them.

[LaydeeBug]

8. that doesn't distinguish from my OP. nt

[Kaleva]

9. What state is bluer then Massachusetts?