Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will the White House learn from the loss of this Senate seat?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:36 PM
Original message
Poll question: Will the White House learn from the loss of this Senate seat?
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 11:44 PM by undeterred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm afraid they don't get it.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 11:41 PM by TexasObserver
I saw Robert Gibbs a few days ago. Those guys don't think any of these losses relate to them.

Bill Clinton made first year mistakes, but he learned from them. Unfortunately, he learned too late and it cost him the House, which ultimately resulted in his impeachment on the weakest of grounds. The president needs to take a good look at 93-94 and figure out how to avoid losing congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatscott15 Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gibbs Needs to Go
He is horrible at representing Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Surely they're not surprised
They don't give a shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nope, because this won't bother them.
The left is not represented in America, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whenever Obama has a failure, he comes back stronger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Unless when he fails to realize he had a failure
That's now what seems to be happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. Well he'd better get on with it then, because he's just been handed a failure.
He needs to go back and take inventory. WHO voted for him? WHO donated money to him? WHO got him elected?

Was it the right wing? The Republicans?

He needs to have a long talk with himself, then get his SHIT BACK TOGETHER and take a hard left turn. If he doesn't, he'll watch his majority and his party go down the crapper, little by little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama's got another repub to be bipartisan with nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. Every cloud has a silver lining
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course it would be logical for the WH to figure that the state of Mass.
wants more progressive legislation! Their elected Senator will so clearly support that! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Am I the only one who sees a naked man?
I mean, no one is saying anything--about a...naked guy on your post.

Looks like a 70's porn star...who is he and why is he in this OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Senator elect Scott Brown is the naked guy and Rahm is the ballerina.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 11:53 PM by undeterred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. that naked guy was the winner in MA? You've got to be kidding. Do the people who voted for him
know that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I wondered that. Was this on the news? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I saw it on Democratic Underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. why didn't they go negative with that? that would have turned off a few wingers, i'd think.
though i guess electing beefcake has precedents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. They could have used the "cover-up" angle
Even then he was hiding his true self :hide::D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Can you imagine what we would have heard if Coakley had posed for Playboy?
The coverage would have been 24/7 since the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Even if she did it 40 years ago
it would be the end of the story for a female candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. They would if Dems knew how to run a hardball campaign properly
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 12:14 AM by Smashcut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. I guess I dont agree with your fundamental position
that the reason the Democrat lost tonight was because Obama isnt left enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I agree
Although we won't know exactly what went wrong for us for a few days- until we get some good polling date, I am fairly certain that Obama not being left enough will NOT be one of the deciding factors. I just think that Coakley ran a bad campaign and the Repubs saw an opening and exploited it. Plus, it was an off-year election, which traditionally sees less turnout (while the Repubs were particularly energized). I bet, however, we could pick Brown off in 2012 with a better candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. No. All hail the Uniparty!
Obama is a Clinton Republican, nobody should be surprised at his betrayal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. No chance. They are in a fantasy world of their own. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC