Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To those who think the MA Senate race was about national issues, here's another perspective

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:22 AM
Original message
To those who think the MA Senate race was about national issues, here's another perspective
From a long-time Boston Dem operative. You know how they say "all politics is local"? Here's a bit of that perspective. This race had almost nothing to do with Obama and anything he's trying to do.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/1/19/827160/-My-Mom-is-a-Democratic-machine-operative-in-Bostonheres-her-explanation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes.It's like Upstate vs. downstate in NY. I find this scenario very believable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. you got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Beacon Hill
is the root of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Superficial analysis. Boils down to "all politics is personal". Ignores why urban areas didn't turn
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 09:34 AM by leveymg
out in MA, VA and NJ, all states that went strong for Obama a year ago. Same thing happened here in VA. The Democratic activists are turned-off by outcomes of HCR, etc. So are the Obama voters - young, urban, minorities - who didn't turn out for Craig Deeds (a Blue Dog who ran against Public Option) and didn't turn out for Coakley, either. The progressive base didn't sweat blood in either race. There's a reason for that, and it is a national problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. no, it explicitly explains why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So many people elsewhere thinks they know why Coakley lost and Brown won
But MA is not the generic "liberal oasis" they think it is. I don't claim to know why Corzine lost in NJ or Deeds lost in VA. And I think there are some arrogant know-it-alls who think they know more about Mass politics than the people who live here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. This is very true. The burbs and towns west of Rt 128 all the way to NY
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 10:21 AM by chelsea0011
have large populations that vote conservative and Republican in many elections. Coakley needed to just be competitive in those towns (she didn't losing many 2-1 and 3-1) and run up the totals in the cities (she did in many) to win. As blue as Ma. gets framed by the media, my town almost never votes blue (Obama squeeked by). And as Republican as these towns go in national and governor races, they are just as likely sending back a dem to the state house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. And you have to know that every single republican in the state showed up at the polls yesterday
And lots of Dems did not show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. YES! Young voters and minority voters followed the traditional pattern of not turning out to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Umm, there's no ground pounding in those areas and Coakley wasn't any different!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. And that doesn't turn into an effect nationally.......
the US Senate seat is a national office. Much like all the ballyhoo about Gillibrand in NY. It is resonating in DC. It is part of the adgenda. If Coakley was the best they could do in Mass. then the future looks bleak.

http://gillibrand.senate.gov/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. She went on vacation with no daily tracking from DNC or her campaign manager...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. What was she doing on vacation during a special election campaign of less than 2 months?
Couldn't she have delayed the vacation until after the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. its call being over confident & taking things for granted much like...
whats happening in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC