Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL - "Republicans Are NOW Thrilled To Have 41 Votes In The Senate!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:40 AM
Original message
LOL - "Republicans Are NOW Thrilled To Have 41 Votes In The Senate!!!
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 10:40 AM by kpete
Panic! at the Caucus Meeting

If you think back to November of 2008, Democrats won a sweeping electoral victory that left them with 59 Senate seats, a majority in the House, and control of the White House. Then thanks to Arlen Specter Democrats wound up with 60 Senate seats. Now after an impressive win by the Republicans in Massachusetts, the Democrats are back to a majority in the House, control of the White House, and 59 Senate seats. The Democratic Party continues to be more popular than the Republican Party, and the President’s approval rating continues to be over 50 percent.

Which is just to say that while losing the MA Senate seat puts certain objective constraints on what Democrats can do the most important constraints come from within. Nothing about losing an election forces you to bend to the will of the guy who won—just ask the Republicans who lost in 2006, then lost in 2008, then opposed everything Obama proposed, and are now thrilled to have 41 votes in the Senate. The option of responding to this setback with determination exists. There’s no rule preventing the House from passing the Senate health care bill. For that matter, there’s no rule preventing the reconciliation process from being used to implement a carbon tax with the revenue split between rebates, investments in clean energy, and deficit reduction. That’s not going to happen, but the reason it’s not going to happen is that Democratic members of congress don’t want to do it. They could go down in history as the people who took bold action to solve that problem, but they prefer not to.

more:
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/01/where-things-stand.php

ANYONE LISTENING?
personally, I am glad we lost the seat - can we all say WAKE-UP CALL???!!!, kpete


Kennedy:
“If the Democrats run for cover, if we become pale carbon copies of the opposition, we will lose — and deserve to lose. The last thing this country needs is two Republican parties.”
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/01/what_ted_kennedy_would_tell_th.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Tea Tea Tea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Usually a party is thrilled to get 51. Now we can dispense with the sham of 60. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. I just don't understand the fact
that one vote is going to bring down the Senate. We have always had 59 votes. And what little we did we got it done with "59". You can't count on Liberman...so why in the devil are they saying we lost our 60 votes. THE DEMOCRATS HAVE THE MAJORITY DAMN IT AND IF THEY HAD SPINE AND GUTS THEY WOULD GET THINGS DONE. The republicans did not have 60 votes. Look at all the reprehensible bills they shoved thru the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. 41 is a majority in the new world...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC