Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pass the Senate bill, then work on unemployment.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:54 AM
Original message
Pass the Senate bill, then work on unemployment.
Frankly, that should have been the priority a year ago. If people are worried about losing their homes and eating, their anger will directed at whomever is in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. SCREW THAT - DROP the Health Care Bill altogether and work on EMPLOYMENT.
People don't want "unemployment" insurance they want JOBS.

and drop the crappy health care bill neither the House NOR the Senate bills are worthy of passing - come back to it and pass SINGLE PAYER or try to and then if it fails use it to attack Republicans with in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's what I meant. Work toward economic recovery.
I still think there are important things in the Senate bill despite the subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. exactly, +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. I disagree
I think 2009 was an off election and they wanted to give it one year to stabilize the banks. They were willing to eat a year of anger. Now with investors more relaxed they are in position to start working on regulation in the election year. In the end all of this should lead to more jobs provided they stick to their plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Multitask
there's over 500 people in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah, but there's only one Senate finance committiee...
...and since Congress will all be mugging for the cameras, their attention span is limited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC