Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Skank of America is losing $$$ and it's YOUR FAULT America, for defaulting on usurious loans.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:02 AM
Original message
Skank of America is losing $$$ and it's YOUR FAULT America, for defaulting on usurious loans.....
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 11:02 AM by marmar
:nopity:


Bank of America Posts Loss After Firm Repays Bailout (Update2)
By David Mildenberg


Jan. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Bank of America Corp., the largest U.S. lender, posted a quarterly loss and its first full-year deficit in more than two decades, driven by the cost of repaying U.S. bailout money and defaults on consumer loans.

The fourth-quarter loss including the cost of exiting the Troubled Asset Relief Program widened to $5.2 billion, or 60 cents a share, from $2.4 billion, or 48 cents, a year earlier, according to a statement. Excluding TARP costs, the deficit was $194 million, the third in the past five quarters for the Charlotte, North Carolina-based lender.

New Chief Executive Officer Brian T. Moynihan has promised a “DNA change” as the firm focuses on operations instead of takeovers and bailouts. Credit cards and home lending were both unprofitable, the bank said. Costs tied to bad loans declined from the third quarter, and the bank said it benefited from gains at investment and brokerage services.

“Economic conditions remain fragile and we expect high unemployment levels to continue, creating an ongoing drag on consumer spending and growth,” Moynihan said in the statement. “We are encouraged by signs the economy is improving, as we have seen in the stabilization of our credit costs, particularly in the consumer business.”

The quarterly report is the first under Moynihan, 50, after he took over on Jan. 1 for Kenneth D. Lewis, 62, who spent more than $120 billion on acquisitions since 2004. Moynihan has said the bank doesn’t need more big purchases to recover from the recession. ........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a4.BLppgBGcI&pos=2




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I suppose their crappy service is my fault too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. BOA, it is called "voting with our feet." Credit unions and local banks are
better than you will ever be. A local banker pulls shit on us and we will practice drifting on his manicured suburban lawn.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yo Bank Man - Shove your bonus up your ass and shut the fuck up!
Die assholes.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hmmmm, they consider it 'losing money' when they
repay a loan? I think I'll stop repaying my loans. I'm losing too much money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Perhaps if TARP had been done correctly, they would have gotten RID
of those toxic loans...That's the way it was supposed to work.. But they took the tarp money, spent it, and kept the toxic loans too..

The money used for TARP, should have gone to re-set the loan amounts for bloated real estate loans, and issued to the home-buyers, in the form of "paydown" coupons, which the banks would then redeem with the Treasury.

Same amount of money, but the loans would be for lower amounts, the banks would get the same money, and the homebuyers would have gotten relief. Defaulted-on homes could have been sold at auction by the govt.

For people who had "better" loans, but whose homes had plummeted, they could have gotten a stimulus check for the percentage of drop, and if they sold the house withing a specified amount of time, they could have had a "payback" clause written in.

Trickle down does not work..

Money that starts at the bottom and works its way through the system, is what creates jobs..

No demand...no supply..no supply needed, no jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC