Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One big factor in yesterday's loss that most people here are ignorant of

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:57 AM
Original message
One big factor in yesterday's loss that most people here are ignorant of
Here's a story from a year and a bit ago:

Waves of scandal rattle Beacon Hill

Beacon Hill is awash in charges of political corruption. Some fear Senator Dianne Wilkerson (left) could give up additional information to seek a lighter sentence. House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi is accused of ethical failings, and Senate President Therese Murray was subpoenaed. Beacon Hill is awash in charges of political corruption. Some fear Senator Dianne Wilkerson (left) could give up additional information to seek a lighter sentence. House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi is accused of ethical failings, and Senate President Therese Murray was subpoenaed.
By Matt Viser and Frank Phillips
Globe Staff / November 2, 2008


Senator Dianne Wilkerson seemed to think last week that her Senate colleagues would go easy on her. And she had reason. All her past indiscretions had been overlooked, and the collegial body that meets in a powder-blue room with cushy chairs has never tried to oust one of its own before a conviction for a crime.

"I trust that you will act consistent with prior practice," Wilkerson wrote in a letter to the Senate president.

But Wilkerson clearly misjudged the size of the shock wave her arrest on bribery charges triggered on Beacon Hill.

Members of the House and Senate - and the Massachusetts public - have already been subjected to a stream of news about the alleged ethical failings of House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi and his close friends. As the taint of corruption settled deeply over the State House last week and subpoenas from the US attorney's office were delivered to top-ranking state officials by the hour, Wilkerson's Senate colleagues quickly moved to purge her.

Beacon Hill is once again awash in charges of political corruption, cronyism, and influence peddling, a spate of scandals that seasoned observers describe as perhaps the worst in three decades. And the sense that shoddy or criminal behavior has become pervasive is peaking just as the state confronts its worst financial crisis in years and needs strong leadership from its elected officials.

"It's really other-worldly, honestly," Senator Mark C. Montigny, a New Bedford Democrat, said of the current atmosphere on Beacon Hill. "What happens at a time like this is it reinforces the worst and the most cynical in politics. And the worst thing a politician can feel is that the public thinks everyone is on the take. Who knows how long we're going to be in the aftermath."

<snip>

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/11/02/waves_of_scandal_rattle_beacon_hill/

And here's a more recent article:

<snip>

Take, for instance, the cases Coakley didn't prosecute as AG. Though she's gone after public officials, the three biggest public-corruption cases of the past three years—the only three that anyone remembers—saw her sitting on the sidelines. The indictment of former House Speaker Sal DiMasi for allegedly receiving payments for state software contracts that he helped push through; the indictments of state Senator Dianne Wilkerson and Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner for allegedly accepting bribe money from undercover FBI agents—Coakley didn't charge any of these people with crimes. The U.S. Attorney's Office did. The FBI had video proof of Wilkerson stuffing bribe money into her bra. Coakley did nothing. The Globe and Secretary of State William Galvin hammered DiMasi and his 
(allegedly) shady friends for 14 months. And the best Coakley could do was indict DiMasi's golfing buddy Richard Vitale? On misdemeanor charges?

Coakley knows that pouncing on big-name prey (like Goldman Sachs) will score headlines and position her as a tough prosecutor. But she also knows toughness will get her only so far. As AG, Scott Harshbarger nailed all sorts of public officials in the 1990s, and paid the price: When he ran for governor in 1998, he did it without the help of state Democrats, many of whom he'd angered at some point. Harshbarger lost.

Coakley has done an intricate little dance these past few years, avoiding Harshbarger's missteps. When the big-name prey wields statewide political clout (DiMasi), or represents a key minority group (Wilkerson), Coakley defers, staying popular at the State House in the process. Today more than 80 state legislators have lent her their full support.

<snip>

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/articles/running_scared_martha_coakley/page2

local stuff. potent local stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boston Globe sportswriter Bob Ryan mentioned Dems' problems in the capital.
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 12:03 PM by Captain Hilts
He talked about this on the Tony Kornheiser radio show.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. dem corruption and Coakley's lack of response to it has been a big story
in MA and the perception of MA statehouse dems being corrupt and Martha turning her head away from it, hurt her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. As AG, has she had any role in the problem? Errors of omission or commission? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. yes. she turned a blind eye to it.
that's the perception anyway. read the boston mag piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting. I had no idea. This must have been what Axelrod was
referring to when he spoke about local problems were, also, a factor in the outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes. This is a legitimate issue. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Oh, yeah. I've been listening to my very dem brother
from Boxford MA, go on about this for over a year. he kept telling me that this was going to be a factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawcomm Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. From the outside looking in,
it looked like she didn't really try. It looked like she thought she had it in the bag merely because of the D next to her name. Of course I'm not familiar with these local problems she may have had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's never simple.
It should be simple. The same goes for just about everything. We've made our lives too complicated. Or maybe that's just the nature of life.

I had a suspicion. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. TIN FOIL ALERT!
You will find anything you can to track folks away from the corrupted voting machines?

The republicans are 10 times more corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC