Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DUers wake the hell up!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:15 PM
Original message
DUers wake the hell up!
Stop trying to analyze why Brown won. He didn't. I remember everyone analyzing why Gore lost, why Kerry lost, why proop 8 "won" in California. It is plain and simple in your face election fraud. WAKE UP! "What we are doing wrong" is not counting our votes. Bush appointeesw are still in charge of the EAC, which oversees our elections.

excerpt from an email from Bev Harris this morning who has been watching the COakley election:


According to preliminary media results by municipality, Democrat Martha Coakley won Massachusetts overall in its hand counted locations,* with 51.12% of the vote (32,247 hand counted votes) to Brown's 30,136, which garnered him 47.77% of hand counted votes. Margin: 3.35% lead for Coakley.

Massachusetts has 71 hand count locations, 91 ES&S locations, and 187 Diebold locations, with two I call the mystery municipalities (Northbridge and Milton) apparently using optical scanners, not sure what kind.

link to discussion, if you are so inclined.


Back to Massachusetts, I think you have a right to know that Coakley won the hand counts there. You can discuss this here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/8/80830.html

That's right.



She also mentions that the hand counts were ready/reported BEFORE the machine counts.

For goodness' sake WAKE THE HELL UP people!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. TIN FOIL FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demmiblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. IBTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bev Harris threw so many REAL election watchers under the bus...
...she failed to notice that her credibility wound up under the bus, too.

Moving on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bev Harris...no thanks.
remembering Andy Stephenson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Seems very unlikely with the margin that there was.
But, hey...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polysciguy420 Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. I say we throw a
GODDAMNED TEA PARTY IN PROTEST! What do you guys say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh please.
Did you expect anyone to believe this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh boy...IBTL. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. No one will address the data. "Bev" is all it takes to get this locked....
Get with it. Worrying about unaudited elections is Soooo 2004....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:25 PM
Original message
maybe because bev the crook has been PROVEN to make shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. So the 71 hand counted locations didn't go to Coakley....
Good to know :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Message from Bev to you:
"GET OVER IT, SCOTT BROWN WON"

From the same link above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. They did go to Coakley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Facts smacts. "Bev" is all anyone needs to know.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. let's take a look at those towns. and don't forget: corrrelation is not causation
Monroe
Mount Washington
New Ashford
Aquinnah
Hawley
Alford
Wendell
Tyringham
Rowe
Washington
Plainfield
Monterey
Savoy
Middlefield
Leyden
Hancock
Heath
Warwick
Peru
Florida
Windsor
Sandisfield
Shutesbury
Tolland
Leverett
West Stockbridge
Egremont
Charlemont
Clarksburg
Goshen
Ashfield
New Marlborough
Worthington
Provincetown
Chesterfield
Colrain
Montgomery
New Braintree
Hinsdale
Chester
Royalston
Conway
Whately
Blandford
West Tisbury
Petersham
Russell
Truro
Westhampton
Cheshire
Phillipston
Huntington
Granville
Wellfleet
Oakham
Millville
Ashby
Plympton
Brimfield
Carlisle
Hampden
Shirley
Rockport
Newburyport
Hudson


Most of those towns are in western mass- where coakley comes from. many are from the berkshires (she's from N. Adams) Coakley won that area period- however the votes were counted. It's the most sparsely populated part of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. What I'll want to see...
is how closely those districts followed historical trends vs. the machine counted districts.

Wait a day or two. I'm sure those numbers will be crunched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bev Harris??
Sorry. No dice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. bwahahahahahah. what a huge heaping ignorant stupid pile of dog shit.
you and anyone who believes this, are totally and completely delusional beyond hope.

on, and fuck bev harris that disgusting piece of crap shyster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bev's credibility (none) made an important issue moot. I've no use for her or her followers. nt
I'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. (facepalm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sarah Palin has more credibility than Bev Harris. She's been running
this scam for years now claiming all elections are stolen. This election was lost by a DLC Democratic candidate who ran a lousy campaign. It's as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. agreed accept she wasn't a DLC candidate. not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Actually I was comparing two lying opportunists, not candidates. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck Bev Harris. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. You need to wake up to the fact that you are a minority opinion and you get 1 vote only
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. I was Andy's friend and am NO fan of Bev Harris, but paying attention and auditing elections is...

...the prudent thing to do. Since Obama won, the outright dismissal of voting system problems by so many Dems is scary. SCARY.

It doesn't always have to be fraud, although fraud is always possible. These machines are so lousy, they can simply break down and fail. Happens often.

Voting machines need to be watched and results audited. Where there are paper ballots, audits can be done. There was paper in MN and paper yesterday in MA.

Sadly millions of us STILL have no voter-verified paper ballot after all these years, and many on here don't care or worry about it.

And THAT, I believe, would break my friend Andy's heart more than Bev Harris ever did.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kma3346 Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Agree totally!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. A lot of us still care about election integrity and are trying to keep
others interested in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Indeed--and the more distance between that lying, cruel, scam artist
and the very important issue of vote tampering the better it will be.

It's a legit issue--but she's made so many enemies among politically motivated people it will take a long time to recover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I know. I am too. But a lot of people dismiss any suggestion of voting machine problems....

...out of hand; here on DU and among Democrats in general. Obama won so the problem must have been solved. All is well. (NOT!)

Until every vote in every state is protected with a voter-verified paper ballot and meaningful audit (Andy's dream) NO ELECTION will be even remotely "safe".

And even after we have voter-verified paper ballots and audits, we will eternally have to be vigilant. And watch our votes and how they are counted.

That is the lesson of 2000 and 2004 -- and too many people have forgotten.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Thank-you demo. I see it over and over. "This is why we lost". The kerry election was
the worst example of it, imho. He PROMISED publicly to count the votes and didn't. Why the hell doesn't anyone care about COUNTING THE VOTES? I mean believing in santa claus makes a lot more sense than believing in Diebold. The man in charge of Diebold's computer programming was convicted and jailed for ...computer fraud...
We can have no democracy without real elections. public elections. We currently have 705 of the country's elections managed by Diebold/ES&S. It is absolutley insane to trust any election results coming from proprietary software. period. ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. well said
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. There were NO audits of yesterday's opscan tallies or even any exit polls.
People are throwing the baby out w/ the bathwater when they take the anti-democracy side of this issue b/c they dislike Bev Harris. You, dd, have more right than just about anyone to remind us that a person who worked hard for election integrity, as DUer Andy did, would be very upset by this use of his tragedy.

Here's a link (not BBV) to a list of dozens of problems occurring w/ opscanners from 2002 to 2008: http://www.votersunite.org/info/OpScansInTheNews.pdf

And here's a link to the local groups trying to help their states secure the count: http://www.votersunite.org/info/groups.asp
I would add to that list in MA the Center for Hand-counted Paper Ballots and in NY the Election Transparency Coalition.

Who's to say that the count in the Dem primary for this race wasn't tampered with? Point is, there's no way of knowing w/o at the very least rigorous audits, or even better, a complete handcount on the spot that night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. The day democracy died
Democracy has been officially dead since the stolen 2000 election and it's even deader now that the electronic machines are in place.

the only reason we got Obama is because he agreed to go along with the corporate will

Obama talks the worker's talk and walks the corporate walk

and it's sort of disturbing that one of the best voting rights advocates out there, Bev Harris, would generate a locked thread on a supposed "underground" democratic forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Remember Andy Stephenson?
That's why she is persona non grata (well, and about a million other reasons).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
46. no I don't
please clue me in. I wasn't here for a couple years, must have missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. she's a scam artist. she ran a scam here at DU
she fucking helped kill Andy. You have no fucking idea what you're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. Huh, I see that POS is trying to be "relevant" again...
and, I am sure, trying to scam money yet again.

The woman is despicable and has NO credibility, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
37. more fucking reason to make it IMPOSSIBLE to lose.
she sucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. Are there still people here who think Bev Harris is credible?
Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
39. Did you read the article at the link you posted? It ended with
the statement "Scott Brown Won, get over it".

This is just more crap helping the wingers make their case that the left are loonies.

Frankly I don't see what the big fucking deal is. We lost one seat. Get over it. The false meme that we need 60 votes to be effective is what people need to get a grip on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. I saw reports of votes filled out for Brown before the voting even started...
If Diebold is running the election..what makes anyone think the election is honest? I mean really now. How many times do they steal you and your childrens future before you do anything about it except bitch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. How many times do they steal you and your childrens future before you do anything about it
damn good question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. And that's another issue - PAPER TRAIL FOR VOTES - that the Dem's are FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
42. Election integrity is a major issue--but bringing up that soulless void Bev Harris
will win you no fans at DU.

Those who don't know her history here really should use the search function. DUers have every reason for piss and vinegar when it comes to her.

Andy, you are not forgotten...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
43. Friendly suggestion:
search the site for information on Bev Harris before starting an OP that has anything to do with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
45. It very well might be true but Bev "The Grifter" Harris, has no credibility..do a DU search
and find out how she bilked people out of thousands of dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC