Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody remember how ecstatic we were to have 59 Senators a year ago?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:48 PM
Original message
Anybody remember how ecstatic we were to have 59 Senators a year ago?
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 12:50 PM by Recursion
And how it signaled the death of the Republican party forever?

Man, those were the days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Still happy we have the "majority"
However with the republican position of block everything no matter what we can no longer accomplish anything of substance. Hell we couldnt even do it with 60. Of course it was a very weak 60 to begin with.

Health care is now done unless they change the senate rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. It isn't just the number
It's what the race supposedly says about the larger electorate.

We were ecstatic with 59 and 60 not just because it theoretically allowed us to push out agenda... but because the REASON we had those majorities was that the PEOPLE agreed with us... and THAT allowed us to push our agenda.

This race doesn't change the political math much, but it's an earthquake shaking the foundation of our assumptions that we won last year because people agreed with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Waited 245 days for Franken to be seated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Oh yeah... that's the same thing.
< /sarcasm>

Because 100k+ vote gap is really the same thing as a race where your oppenent was leading after the first count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's the trend that should worry people
Virginia Nov. 2008 -> Nov. 2009, 30 point shift away from Democrats to Republicans.
Massachusetts Nov. 2008 -> Jan. 2010, 31 point shift away from Democrats to Republicans.

A huge chunk of the electorate in both cases, and in two very different states, abandoned the party - and not only abandoned, but also saw fit to pull the opposition lever.

People are desperately seeking someone who will deliver them something other than corruption, arrogance, and lies.

Which party will deliver?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It gets back to my rant about independents: they're not the same as moderates
They don't care whether we have a Reagan or an FDR, they want somebody who will stop screwing around and get shit done one way or the other.

For that matter, a fully implemented conservative program, while much worse than a fully implemented liberal program, would be better than the half-measure compromises we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. NJ too.
All three have potential alternative explanations for the shift... but all three together make each one that much harder to swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. If we get rid of Harry Reid we'd be in the clear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Give it a few months.
That problem is taking care of itself.

Now... whether or not that's a good thing is yet to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. yeah, but we had big MO then!
apparently direction matters more than actual votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC